<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Rights, No Responsibilities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2006/11/27/140/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2006/11/27/140</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:03:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2006/11/27/140/comment-page-1#comment-46807</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2006/11/27/140#comment-46807</guid>
		<description>Eugenia,

This picture is of Michael Kopper, the subject of this commentary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eugenia,</p>
<p>This picture is of Michael Kopper, the subject of this commentary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugenia</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2006/11/27/140/comment-page-1#comment-46797</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugenia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2006/11/27/140#comment-46797</guid>
		<description>A person on the picture is not Andrew Fastow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A person on the picture is not Andrew Fastow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2006/11/27/140/comment-page-1#comment-10946</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 07:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2006/11/27/140#comment-10946</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a bit of a misstatement to say that &quot;authorities could not go after Dobson&#039;s share.&quot;  While it is true that Dobson does not have the same fiscal obligation as, say, Lea Fastow in similar circumstances, as the quote notes, it could have been a significant hassle for prosecutors to seize those funds, and partly for the non-recognized &quot;marriage.&quot;  At the same time, if it could have been proved beyond reasonable doubt that Dodson was aware of what was going on with Chewco that provided him with that $9 million, he could have been very easily indicted as a co-conspirator.  It&#039;s mostly the issue of prosecutors not being able to pursue Dodson as such that may have prompted abandoment of any pursuit of reclamation.  If the government wanted that money that badly, they would find a way to get it somewhere within the law..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a bit of a misstatement to say that &#8220;authorities could not go after Dobson&#8217;s share.&#8221;  While it is true that Dobson does not have the same fiscal obligation as, say, Lea Fastow in similar circumstances, as the quote notes, it could have been a significant hassle for prosecutors to seize those funds, and partly for the non-recognized &#8220;marriage.&#8221;  At the same time, if it could have been proved beyond reasonable doubt that Dodson was aware of what was going on with Chewco that provided him with that $9 million, he could have been very easily indicted as a co-conspirator.  It&#8217;s mostly the issue of prosecutors not being able to pursue Dodson as such that may have prompted abandoment of any pursuit of reclamation.  If the government wanted that money that badly, they would find a way to get it somewhere within the law..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

