<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You Can Support Hate Crimes Legislation &#8212; Courtesy of the American Family Association</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/06/16/450/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/06/16/450</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:03:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/06/16/450/comment-page-1#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/06/16/450#comment-797</guid>
		<description>Well, I never thought this would happen, but the AFA has actually slightly changed the wording in their &quot;Action Alert&quot; on the hate crimes bill.  I had written the AFA a letter pointing out what I believed was incorrect information they posted about the bill; and I&#039;m sure they received a ton of feedback, especially after Snopes.com started calling their work the stuff of urban legend.

But I checked back on the AFA&#039;s website today.  Most of the Action Alert is identical, yet there has been a subtle change in words.  Consider the following excerpts taken from the Action Alert on June 18 (I&#039;ve boldfaced the words that have changed):

&lt;blockquote&gt;A bill in Congress &lt;strong&gt;makes&lt;/strong&gt; it a crime for pastors and churches to speak against homosexuality. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;The proposed law &lt;strong&gt;would&lt;/strong&gt; make it a crime to preach on Romans Chapter 1 or I Corinthians Chapter 6.  Or even to discuss them in a Sunday School class. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Senate bill S. 1105 &lt;strong&gt;would&lt;/strong&gt; make negative statements concerning homosexuality, such as calling the practice of homosexuality a sin from the pulpit, a &#039;hate crime&#039; punishable by law.&lt;/blockquote&gt;   

As of five minutes ago, the Action Alert now reads:

&lt;blockquote&gt;A bill in Congress &lt;strong&gt;could make&lt;/strong&gt; it a crime for pastors and churches to speak against homosexuality. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;The proposed law &lt;strong&gt;could&lt;/strong&gt; make it a crime to preach on Romans Chapter 1 or I Corinthians Chapter 6.  Or even to discuss them in a Sunday School class. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Senate bill S. 1105 &lt;strong&gt;could&lt;/strong&gt; make negative statements concerning homosexuality, such as calling the practice of homosexuality a sin from the pulpit, a &#039;hate crime&#039; punishable by law.&lt;/blockquote&gt;   

So I think the changed text is still ignorant and fear-motivated... but, hey, at least it&#039;s no longer an outright lie.  I must admit that I&#039;m quite encouraged; the efforts of everyone who wrote to AFA, blogged about it, or contributed to the Snopes.com work should be thanked.

And thanks to AFA for reconsidering their facts and words.  Here&#039;s hoping they continue to reconsider things...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I never thought this would happen, but the AFA has actually slightly changed the wording in their &#8220;Action Alert&#8221; on the hate crimes bill.  I had written the AFA a letter pointing out what I believed was incorrect information they posted about the bill; and I&#8217;m sure they received a ton of feedback, especially after Snopes.com started calling their work the stuff of urban legend.</p>
<p>But I checked back on the AFA&#8217;s website today.  Most of the Action Alert is identical, yet there has been a subtle change in words.  Consider the following excerpts taken from the Action Alert on June 18 (I&#8217;ve boldfaced the words that have changed):</p>
<blockquote><p>A bill in Congress <strong>makes</strong> it a crime for pastors and churches to speak against homosexuality.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>The proposed law <strong>would</strong> make it a crime to preach on Romans Chapter 1 or I Corinthians Chapter 6.  Or even to discuss them in a Sunday School class. </p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Senate bill S. 1105 <strong>would</strong> make negative statements concerning homosexuality, such as calling the practice of homosexuality a sin from the pulpit, a &#8216;hate crime&#8217; punishable by law.</p></blockquote>
<p>As of five minutes ago, the Action Alert now reads:</p>
<blockquote><p>A bill in Congress <strong>could make</strong> it a crime for pastors and churches to speak against homosexuality.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>The proposed law <strong>could</strong> make it a crime to preach on Romans Chapter 1 or I Corinthians Chapter 6.  Or even to discuss them in a Sunday School class. </p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Senate bill S. 1105 <strong>could</strong> make negative statements concerning homosexuality, such as calling the practice of homosexuality a sin from the pulpit, a &#8216;hate crime&#8217; punishable by law.</p></blockquote>
<p>So I think the changed text is still ignorant and fear-motivated&#8230; but, hey, at least it&#8217;s no longer an outright lie.  I must admit that I&#8217;m quite encouraged; the efforts of everyone who wrote to AFA, blogged about it, or contributed to the Snopes.com work should be thanked.</p>
<p>And thanks to AFA for reconsidering their facts and words.  Here&#8217;s hoping they continue to reconsider things&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynelle</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/06/16/450/comment-page-1#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/06/16/450#comment-664</guid>
		<description>There is a new Action Alert this morning. We are supporting the AFA in writing letters to Presdeint George Bush about the CDC paying for sex changes and beauty contests for drag queens. 

We must pull together to stop the liberals from spending our tax dollars on perversion parties and sin.

God Bless!

Lynelle :-)

ps... There is still a picture of a 1/2 naked homosexual on your site - top left corner. Homosexual activists must have hacked into your site. I thought you would want to know so you could take it down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a new Action Alert this morning. We are supporting the AFA in writing letters to Presdeint George Bush about the CDC paying for sex changes and beauty contests for drag queens. </p>
<p>We must pull together to stop the liberals from spending our tax dollars on perversion parties and sin.</p>
<p>God Bless!</p>
<p>Lynelle :-)</p>
<p>ps&#8230; There is still a picture of a 1/2 naked homosexual on your site &#8211; top left corner. Homosexual activists must have hacked into your site. I thought you would want to know so you could take it down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOHN ROBERTS</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/06/16/450/comment-page-1#comment-640</link>
		<dc:creator>JOHN ROBERTS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/06/16/450#comment-640</guid>
		<description>where in the gospel does it say, that we are to put standing on our beliefs about sin(according to our interpretation of scripture)  above the fellowship of walking in the light. particularly, when we have not tested those beliefs, with a 1john1 witness with our homosexuals brothers in christ, with whom we share the same inheritance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where in the gospel does it say, that we are to put standing on our beliefs about sin(according to our interpretation of scripture)  above the fellowship of walking in the light. particularly, when we have not tested those beliefs, with a 1john1 witness with our homosexuals brothers in christ, with whom we share the same inheritance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Ditto</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/06/16/450/comment-page-1#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ditto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 00:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/06/16/450#comment-630</guid>
		<description>In reality all it does is let them say they have one more signature, and unless some poor sap working in a congressional office actually goes through the whole list (which they don&#039;t), they too will just assume the signature is valid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reality all it does is let them say they have one more signature, and unless some poor sap working in a congressional office actually goes through the whole list (which they don&#8217;t), they too will just assume the signature is valid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Burroway</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/06/16/450/comment-page-1#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Burroway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 23:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/06/16/450#comment-629</guid>
		<description>cooner,

Follow your suspicions. It turns out it&#039;s a parody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cooner,</p>
<p>Follow your suspicions. It turns out it&#8217;s a parody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cooner</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/06/16/450/comment-page-1#comment-626</link>
		<dc:creator>cooner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 18:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/06/16/450#comment-626</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm. I&#039;d love to go and screw with their petition, although again, that warning sounds a little fishy ... If he&#039;s speaking to the Believers already, why would he be warning them not to &quot;accidentally&quot; type anything pro-gay, anti-AFA in the Name slots ...?

I&#039;m all confused now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm. I&#8217;d love to go and screw with their petition, although again, that warning sounds a little fishy &#8230; If he&#8217;s speaking to the Believers already, why would he be warning them not to &#8220;accidentally&#8221; type anything pro-gay, anti-AFA in the Name slots &#8230;?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m all confused now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/06/16/450/comment-page-1#comment-625</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/06/16/450#comment-625</guid>
		<description>ahhh...&quot;christians only&quot;...which I&#039;m assuming means only those who profess to lie and bear false witness as a foundation to their spiritual journey. 

The American &quot;Family&quot; Association has become such a clown act that I fully expect them to soom upstage any entertainment Ringling Bros. could ever produce. 

Do the Wildmon&#039;s actually belong to a denomination? Or are they just another con-artist con-servative political action committee masquerading as the sole representatives of God?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ahhh&#8230;&#8221;christians only&#8221;&#8230;which I&#8217;m assuming means only those who profess to lie and bear false witness as a foundation to their spiritual journey. </p>
<p>The American &#8220;Family&#8221; Association has become such a clown act that I fully expect them to soom upstage any entertainment Ringling Bros. could ever produce. </p>
<p>Do the Wildmon&#8217;s actually belong to a denomination? Or are they just another con-artist con-servative political action committee masquerading as the sole representatives of God?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rmthunter</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/06/16/450/comment-page-1#comment-623</link>
		<dc:creator>rmthunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 11:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/06/16/450#comment-623</guid>
		<description>Just put your real message in the first and last name blanks.  All they&#039;ll have left if they&#039;re stripping those out will be zip codes (which must be numeric).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just put your real message in the first and last name blanks.  All they&#8217;ll have left if they&#8217;re stripping those out will be zip codes (which must be numeric).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samantha Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/06/16/450/comment-page-1#comment-622</link>
		<dc:creator>Samantha Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 07:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/06/16/450#comment-622</guid>
		<description>Something in me thinks that it&#039;s a trick. They probably strip anti-AFA stuff from the petition and just say that the congresscritters can read it in order to trick people like you and me into giving them an extra signature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something in me thinks that it&#8217;s a trick. They probably strip anti-AFA stuff from the petition and just say that the congresscritters can read it in order to trick people like you and me into giving them an extra signature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn David</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/06/16/450/comment-page-1#comment-621</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 06:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/06/16/450#comment-621</guid>
		<description>The former Christian in me still has a angry reaction to those who call themselves the more perfect of Christians, honest defenders of the faith, and yet do find it necessary to lie for their supposed savior and faith.

Hypocrisy, they name is Wildmon [and various other &#039;&lt;i&gt;Family&lt;/i&gt;&#039; proponents].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The former Christian in me still has a angry reaction to those who call themselves the more perfect of Christians, honest defenders of the faith, and yet do find it necessary to lie for their supposed savior and faith.</p>
<p>Hypocrisy, they name is Wildmon [and various other '<i>Family</i>' proponents].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

