Comments on: Cameronite Updates: How To Cite Cameron Without Citing Cameron http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/12/01/1073 News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:51:34 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: The Story So Far… » Blog Archive » How The Game Is Played…(continued) http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/12/01/1073/comment-page-1#comment-4585 The Story So Far… » Blog Archive » How The Game Is Played…(continued) Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:57:59 +0000 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/12/01/1073#comment-4585 [...] in right wing anti-gay propaganda, by citing someone else, who in turn cites Cameron.  But this is a first [...] [...] in right wing anti-gay propaganda, by citing someone else, who in turn cites Cameron.  But this is a first [...]

]]> By: Jason http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/12/01/1073/comment-page-1#comment-4584 Jason Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:43:52 +0000 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/12/01/1073#comment-4584 Okay, that's what I thought, I just wanted it to be put out there so that anyone reading knows that this isn't just evasive, it's academically and journalistically unprofessional. Okay, that’s what I thought, I just wanted it to be put out there so that anyone reading knows that this isn’t just evasive, it’s academically and journalistically unprofessional.

]]> By: Emily K http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/12/01/1073/comment-page-1#comment-4573 Emily K Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:27:46 +0000 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/12/01/1073#comment-4573 It's true, Jason is right. And if you can't get your hands on the original source, so you don't know what the original quote is, you're supposed to right "Cameron qtd in [source]" or something like that. That way you're giving credit to the original. Like all ex-gay "scientists" and "researchers," they have terrible academic practices. It’s true, Jason is right. And if you can’t get your hands on the original source, so you don’t know what the original quote is, you’re supposed to right “Cameron qtd in [source]” or something like that. That way you’re giving credit to the original. Like all ex-gay “scientists” and “researchers,” they have terrible academic practices.

]]> By: Ben in Oakland http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/12/01/1073/comment-page-1#comment-4572 Ben in Oakland Sun, 02 Dec 2007 23:42:32 +0000 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/12/01/1073#comment-4572 I think it counts as trying to avoid naming your source. I think it counts as trying to avoid naming your source.

]]> By: Michael http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/12/01/1073/comment-page-1#comment-4571 Michael Sun, 02 Dec 2007 21:59:34 +0000 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/12/01/1073#comment-4571 Jason, you're right. Unless you absolutely can't get access to the original (which can't be true in this case), you really need to cite the original source. I don't know if it's technically "plagiarism," but it's definitely bad form in anything vaguely academic. Jason, you’re right. Unless you absolutely can’t get access to the original (which can’t be true in this case), you really need to cite the original source. I don’t know if it’s technically “plagiarism,” but it’s definitely bad form in anything vaguely academic.

]]> By: Jason http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/12/01/1073/comment-page-1#comment-4569 Jason Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:02:55 +0000 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/12/01/1073#comment-4569 correct me if I'm wrong, as it's been years since I've had to do proper citation, but aren't you supposed to cite the original author/paper/study unless you are talking about someone else's commentary on such? Does this count as plagarism or is it just bad writing? correct me if I’m wrong, as it’s been years since I’ve had to do proper citation, but aren’t you supposed to cite the original author/paper/study unless you are talking about someone else’s commentary on such?

Does this count as plagarism or is it just bad writing?

]]> By: David http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/12/01/1073/comment-page-1#comment-4558 David Sun, 02 Dec 2007 03:08:12 +0000 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/12/01/1073#comment-4558 I think writing to Fuller Theological Seminary's psycology department to demand an explanation is in order. If a member of their faculty is going to engage in such dishonesty they should be forced to take action. The school's address is: Fuller Theological Seminary 135 N. Oakland Ave. Pasadena, CA 91182 I think writing to Fuller Theological Seminary’s psycology department to demand an explanation is in order. If a member of their faculty is going to engage in such dishonesty they should be forced to take action.

The school’s address is:

Fuller Theological Seminary
135 N. Oakland Ave.
Pasadena, CA 91182

]]> By: mcewen http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/12/01/1073/comment-page-1#comment-4556 mcewen Sun, 02 Dec 2007 00:24:06 +0000 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2007/12/01/1073#comment-4556 a group down here in south carolina did something like that. they cited a book by thomas schmidt. but schmidt used cameron's work in the book. a group down here in south carolina did something like that.

they cited a book by thomas schmidt. but schmidt used cameron’s work in the book.

]]>