<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Case For Banning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/01/12/1270/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/01/12/1270</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/01/12/1270/comment-page-1#comment-5661</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/01/12/1270#comment-5661</guid>
		<description>Radical suggestion that I&#039;m not sure is even possible:

Make it part of accepted, licensed counselling practice.

Continue to make it clear that this is counselling, not treatment for mental illness, since homosexuality isn&#039;t an illness.

Make it illegal for anyone unlicensed to do it, like surgery.

Make the malpractice rules VEEEEERY stringent, about who can be considered &quot;candidates&quot;, the amount of informed consent necessary, acceptable techniques (i.e. talk-therapy only), reporting of results, follow-up, etc etc.

Then, the practice will simply die on its own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radical suggestion that I&#8217;m not sure is even possible:</p>
<p>Make it part of accepted, licensed counselling practice.</p>
<p>Continue to make it clear that this is counselling, not treatment for mental illness, since homosexuality isn&#8217;t an illness.</p>
<p>Make it illegal for anyone unlicensed to do it, like surgery.</p>
<p>Make the malpractice rules VEEEEERY stringent, about who can be considered &#8220;candidates&#8221;, the amount of informed consent necessary, acceptable techniques (i.e. talk-therapy only), reporting of results, follow-up, etc etc.</p>
<p>Then, the practice will simply die on its own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suricou Raven</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/01/12/1270/comment-page-1#comment-5655</link>
		<dc:creator>Suricou Raven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/01/12/1270#comment-5655</guid>
		<description>I have a different suggestion: Just make sure that anyone offering it is liable for any damage it may cause, and that its not possible for a anyone to sign away this protection. Sooner or later one of their ex-patients will sue. They have more failures than successes, and plenty of those failures will be very bitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a different suggestion: Just make sure that anyone offering it is liable for any damage it may cause, and that its not possible for a anyone to sign away this protection. Sooner or later one of their ex-patients will sue. They have more failures than successes, and plenty of those failures will be very bitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
