I support Rev. Hutcherson’s right to speak @ a public school because it would be a nice to hear some1 who sees something wrong with homosexuality & transeuxality speak instead of the same predictable proselytizing that groups like PFLAG do. OK, discussing religion in a public school does break Federal law surrounding separation of Church&State. But even if Rev. Hutcherson did discuss Christianity & I’m not a Christian (thank God I’m not Jewish), then so what? I want Rev. Hutcheson to say something in a public school which will anger Timothy Kincaid & Jim Burroway.

Before continuing, contrary to what Jim Burroway & Mike Airhart have said, most married couples do not engage in oral sex & sodomy. They only engage in straight normal activity (penis entering vagina). Though many married couples do engage in oral sex & sodomy, many incl. myself as of 2005 believe that they must cure this as well & limit it to straight normal activity only.

I don’t care if you call me a bigot because I agree with Reverend Hutcheson. I’m proud of the fact that I’m against sex changes & I’m proud to be called a homophobe. What I find rude is when rather than asking me if I’m religious, you automatically say that I base my beliefs on religion. Please ask before you presume. While I’m not an atheist, you don’t have to be religious to agree with Reverend Hutcheson.

Reverend Hutcheson is pro-life, but I’m pro-choice. I wrote on another forum the reason I’m pro-choice-if there was a device built in the future which could predicted that an unborn baby would be born handicapped, would engage in homo&lesbian sexual activities or would have Gender Dysphoria (GID), then yes, I would abort it. If I had no arms & legs, tehn I wouldn’t want to be born.

I don’t hate homosexuals & lesbians, but the world is a better place w/o homosexuality & w/o GID. Reverend Hutcheson doesn’t hate homosexuals, but he is against their sexual behaviors. I realize my comments will offend you, but given that I see something wrong with certain sexual activities & GID, I believe in curing it & as does Reverend Hutcheson. Whether homosexuality & GID is the result of genes, biology or learned behavior are sideissues. My belief is finding a cure for it, regardless of what causes it.

You decry Reverend Hutcheson, who has to be consistent with his religious faith. Reverend Hutcheson must condemn same sex activities for the same reason that a Hindu priest should condemn beefeating. Incidentally I’m a vegetarian. In justness to Rev. Hutcheson & other Christian ministers, they opposed homosexuality, long before discussions arose over the causes. It’s unjust to ask Reverend Hutcheson to change his views, just as it’s unjust to ask a Hindu to change his views on cows.

While I’m not an expert on repair therapy, Reverend Hutcheson believes in it & honestly, the efficacy of repair therapy is another sideissue, because homosexual groups against it no matter what the efficacy is. Also tennis legend Martina Navratilova (though not cited here) has not usu. been critiqued for her selectiveness in protesting animal cruelty. Martina Navratilova protested experiments to make gay sheep straight on the grounds it’s animal cruelty, yet I haven’t heard Martina Navratilova protest sex change maimings which were 1st done on animals & many animals died cruel deaths in these maimings incl. the hormone shots. Martina Navratilova is against the experiments to make gay sheep straight because if they did discover the cure for animal homosexuality, then repair therapists will use animal studies to find the cure for human homosexuality, though the experiments to make gay sheep straight is incidental to repair therapy. But if Martina Navratilova really cares about ending animal cruelty, then she’ll support abolishing sex changes.

The mainstream press usu. bashes Reverend Hutcheson, as does this site, because most of them differ with what he says. The press incl. BTB usu. look the other way @ Martina Navratilova’s selectiveness on animal cruelty, because they agree with her ideologically.

I know my comments will offend you, but I wanted to raise something which the mainstream press usu. doesn’t raise. Critiquing religious people such as Reverend Hutcheson doesn’t require any courage. It isn’t as if anything being written by you raise anything new. It has been my observation that the same posters visit other sites such as Dr. Throckmorton & rehash the same things that they post here regarding Reverend Hutcheson. It does require audacity to defend Reverend Hutcheson’s view. Once again, I’m not religious, but I share Reverend Hutcheson’s views for reasons unrelated to religion.

In their version, its a story about how the leftists are so hateful of free speech they wont even let a Christian speak without shouting him down :>