Comments on: Glenn T. Stanton Responds to Professor Patrick Chapman

By: Joel

Joel — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:00:59 +0000

Ill eventually read CHairms extremely long debate with some extremely long replies… but the one thing i read was prety much answered on Chapmans sequel.

By: On Lawn

On Lawn — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:59:43 +0000

Timothy Kincaid: Comment was off topic

By: Fannie

Fannie — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:52:01 +0000

Back on topic, the respectful dialogue between Chapman and Stanton has been an overall refreshing and fun read. I am confident that we can rest assured that neither of these gentlemen will resort to using the notorious Argument from Silence to declare victory or assign dodgy motives. [Moving along to read Chapman's latest installment]

By: Jason D

Jason D — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:45:45 +0000

Timothy Kincaid: Comment was off topic

By: On Lawn

On Lawn — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:38:47 +0000

Timothy Kincaid: Comment was off topic

By: On Lawn

On Lawn — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:30:21 +0000

Timothy Kincaid: comment was off topic

By: Jason D

Jason D — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:14:50 +0000

On Lawn,

Do you have any opinions that relate to either Chapman or Stanton or the topic of the thread?

looks like he doesn’t.

By: On Lawn

On Lawn — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:39:42 +0000

TJ,

Many thanks, you are correct. I meant asceticism, not aesthetic. I hope providing the usage, “in keeping one pure of physical pleasures or manipulations” helped.

By: On Lawn

On Lawn — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:36:24 +0000

Timothy,

In reply to your latest comment, “Do you have any opinions that relate to either Chapman or Stanton or the topic of the thread?”

It is a good attempt to dismiss, much like you tried to do with Chairm. However, it will likely only get people to read the comment for themselves, and no doubt they will wonder why you are unclear on the matter. Just saying.

The answer, assuming your ingenuousness, is that it is a stirring debate so far. Its been a very fun read, and as always so are the comments that followed. Is there anything specific you feel has strayed in the conversation?

By: Jim Burroway

Jim Burroway — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:31:50 +0000

John Howard The only "rights" we're talking about are the 1,049 rights, benefits, responsiblities and obligations that come with marriage. What you are doing is creating a strawman, and hijacking this thread toward your favorite subject. Since you insist on behaving this way, I will place you on moderation until I see that you are actually interested in participating in the discussion that is taking place, and not the unrelated one you want to take place. For that, you have your own web site.