<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five Egyptian HIV+ Men Sentenced to 3 Years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/04/09/1783/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/04/09/1783</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:03:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/04/09/1783/comment-page-1#comment-9055</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 05:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/04/09/1783#comment-9055</guid>
		<description>Since they arrested one non HIV positive man, i believe that just seems to be a coincidence. 

Why would they call it a &quot;&#039;growing witchhunt&#039; for people suspected of being HIV-positive&quot;, this story does not add to this witchhunt, but rather, questioning if this HIVpositive=gay=criminal as the human rights watch wants to portray it, to be true.

SO egypt arrests ppl for BEING gay? Or like Iran... for gay intercourse/relationship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since they arrested one non HIV positive man, i believe that just seems to be a coincidence. </p>
<p>Why would they call it a &#8220;&#8216;growing witchhunt&#8217; for people suspected of being HIV-positive&#8221;, this story does not add to this witchhunt, but rather, questioning if this HIVpositive=gay=criminal as the human rights watch wants to portray it, to be true.</p>
<p>SO egypt arrests ppl for BEING gay? Or like Iran&#8230; for gay intercourse/relationship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Burroway</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/04/09/1783/comment-page-1#comment-9054</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Burroway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 04:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/04/09/1783#comment-9054</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, Emily. Strictly speaking, we don&#039;t know. However based on the circumstances of their arrest, it appears that they are gay. Nevertheless, I&#039;ve changed the headline to reflect how most news reports are reporting the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, Emily. Strictly speaking, we don&#8217;t know. However based on the circumstances of their arrest, it appears that they are gay. Nevertheless, I&#8217;ve changed the headline to reflect how most news reports are reporting the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily K</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/04/09/1783/comment-page-1#comment-9050</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 01:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/04/09/1783#comment-9050</guid>
		<description>Wait, do we know they&#039;re gay and they&#039;re HIV+? Or do they just assume they&#039;re gay BECAUSE they&#039;re HIV+? 

It&#039;s always disheartening to see an encouragement of the gay-HIV+ stereotype - by gay HIV+ men.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, do we know they&#8217;re gay and they&#8217;re HIV+? Or do they just assume they&#8217;re gay BECAUSE they&#8217;re HIV+? </p>
<p>It&#8217;s always disheartening to see an encouragement of the gay-HIV+ stereotype &#8211; by gay HIV+ men.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

