<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Focus On the Family&#8217;s Familiar New Logo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/01/1916/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/01/1916</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:03:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ McFisty</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/01/1916/comment-page-1#comment-10141</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ McFisty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 19:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/01/1916#comment-10141</guid>
		<description>Well, of course, let&#039;s not forget that the child in the logo is white. Much like the &quot;No White Male-ish Child Left Behind&quot; logo.

Actually, I know the very good reason (cheaper print costs) for the absence of ink which is all that it is, but I always have to get that razz in there cuz if &lt;b&gt;I&#039;d&lt;/b&gt; created such a logo I&#039;d get called on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, of course, let&#8217;s not forget that the child in the logo is white. Much like the &#8220;No White Male-ish Child Left Behind&#8221; logo.</p>
<p>Actually, I know the very good reason (cheaper print costs) for the absence of ink which is all that it is, but I always have to get that razz in there cuz if <b>I&#8217;d</b> created such a logo I&#8217;d get called on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/01/1916/comment-page-1#comment-10138</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 17:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/01/1916#comment-10138</guid>
		<description>Interesting that the hands/arms holding onto the child are not specific in gender.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that the hands/arms holding onto the child are not specific in gender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erica B.</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/01/1916/comment-page-1#comment-10118</link>
		<dc:creator>Erica B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 12:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/01/1916#comment-10118</guid>
		<description>The family focused on in their new logo is a small child. A small child holding two disconnected arms over its head in gory triumph....

OK, I realize that&#039;s not how it&#039;s intended -- but a family is supposed to include all its parts. Shouldn&#039;t the parents be fully in the picture?

But of course, they&#039;re not really interested in &lt;i&gt;families&lt;/i&gt;... just insulting gay people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The family focused on in their new logo is a small child. A small child holding two disconnected arms over its head in gory triumph&#8230;.</p>
<p>OK, I realize that&#8217;s not how it&#8217;s intended &#8212; but a family is supposed to include all its parts. Shouldn&#8217;t the parents be fully in the picture?</p>
<p>But of course, they&#8217;re not really interested in <i>families</i>&#8230; just insulting gay people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Gonzales</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/01/1916/comment-page-1#comment-10074</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Gonzales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 18:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/01/1916#comment-10074</guid>
		<description>The old logo always looked like it belonged on a bottle of root-beer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The old logo always looked like it belonged on a bottle of root-beer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

