<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California Gets Gay Marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/15/2019/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/15/2019</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:56:50 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ephilei</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/15/2019/comment-page-1#comment-10927</link>
		<dc:creator>Ephilei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/15/2019#comment-10927</guid>
		<description>Woo hoo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woo hoo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/15/2019/comment-page-1#comment-10919</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/15/2019#comment-10919</guid>
		<description>This ruling today may well have an impact on whether Brad Pitt gets married.  In 2006 he said:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Angie and I will consider tying the knot when everyone else in the country who wants to be married is legally able,&quot; the 42-year-old actor reveals in Esquire magazine&#039;s October issue, on newsstands September 19. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Brad could probably get away with revising his vow now and have a California wedding.  I wouldn&#039;t hold it against him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This ruling today may well have an impact on whether Brad Pitt gets married.  In 2006 he said:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Angie and I will consider tying the knot when everyone else in the country who wants to be married is legally able,&#8221; the 42-year-old actor reveals in Esquire magazine&#8217;s October issue, on newsstands September 19. </p></blockquote>
<p>Brad could probably get away with revising his vow now and have a California wedding.  I wouldn&#8217;t hold it against him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cowboy</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/15/2019/comment-page-1#comment-10917</link>
		<dc:creator>cowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/15/2019#comment-10917</guid>
		<description>Yeah…Jim, those dreams (or fantasies) are just that.   Marrying Mr. Pitt would take some huge steps.  Taking steps over being Daddy-to-be to twins, being married to Ms. Angelina Jolie and being a hunky hetero are some mighty big steps to get over.   But I appreciate your fantasy.  I have a couple pictures of Mr. Pitt as one of the choices for my cell phone wallpaper.   One from the Thelma &amp; Louise era and one where he does a mighty fine impression of an architect in a hardhat.   (sigh)   

But let’s celebrate the possibility we can marry someone &lt;i&gt;LIKE&lt;/i&gt; Mr. Pitt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah…Jim, those dreams (or fantasies) are just that.   Marrying Mr. Pitt would take some huge steps.  Taking steps over being Daddy-to-be to twins, being married to Ms. Angelina Jolie and being a hunky hetero are some mighty big steps to get over.   But I appreciate your fantasy.  I have a couple pictures of Mr. Pitt as one of the choices for my cell phone wallpaper.   One from the Thelma &amp; Louise era and one where he does a mighty fine impression of an architect in a hardhat.   (sigh)   </p>
<p>But let’s celebrate the possibility we can marry someone <i>LIKE</i> Mr. Pitt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crazymonk</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/15/2019/comment-page-1#comment-10885</link>
		<dc:creator>crazymonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 18:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/15/2019#comment-10885</guid>
		<description>&quot;Now one of ten Americans live in a state in which gay people are accorded full equality under the law.&quot;

I think you mean &quot;are accorded full equality under state law.&quot;  Even married couples in Massachusetts don&#039;t have full federal rights, such as immigration benefits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Now one of ten Americans live in a state in which gay people are accorded full equality under the law.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you mean &#8220;are accorded full equality under state law.&#8221;  Even married couples in Massachusetts don&#8217;t have full federal rights, such as immigration benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/15/2019/comment-page-1#comment-10875</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 17:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/15/2019#comment-10875</guid>
		<description>Jim,

What I was referring to is Prop 22.

Anti-gays claimed that it prohibited gay marriage.  Pro-marriage advocates argued before the court that it only restricted gay marriages from out of state, due to its location in the code.

I am not sure how this case settled that issue.  Ironically, if they agreed with the pro-gay side it is possible that CA still does not recognize marriage from Massachusetts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,</p>
<p>What I was referring to is Prop 22.</p>
<p>Anti-gays claimed that it prohibited gay marriage.  Pro-marriage advocates argued before the court that it only restricted gay marriages from out of state, due to its location in the code.</p>
<p>I am not sure how this case settled that issue.  Ironically, if they agreed with the pro-gay side it is possible that CA still does not recognize marriage from Massachusetts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Burroway</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/15/2019/comment-page-1#comment-10871</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Burroway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 17:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/15/2019#comment-10871</guid>
		<description>As I understand it, the out-of-state restriction was a unique quirk of Massachusetts law from 1913. I don&#039;t think it applies here.

Finally! My dreams of marrying Brad Pitt are one step closer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I understand it, the out-of-state restriction was a unique quirk of Massachusetts law from 1913. I don&#8217;t think it applies here.</p>
<p>Finally! My dreams of marrying Brad Pitt are one step closer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
