<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maggie Gallagher is Untruthful About CA Marriage Ruling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/15/2026/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/15/2026</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:03:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/15/2026/comment-page-1#comment-11105</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 08:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/15/2026#comment-11105</guid>
		<description>Well, Maggie brought the word &quot;bigot&quot; into it, by saying that the people who opposed mixed-race marriages in the early half of the century were bigots (because their moral beliefs were wrong) and Maggie and her ilk are not bigots (because their moral beliefs are right.)  

She doesn&#039;t really provide a way to distinguish bigots from non-bigots, except to repeat two fallacies:
1.) The majority of a population cannot be bigoted.
and
2.) People motivated by religious beliefs cannot be bigoted.

It&#039;s true that she likes to present herself as thoughtful and reasoned.  I felt she lost all credibility when it was discovered that she had been covertly paid to promote the Bush administration&#039;s marriage agenda, a fact which she did not immediately disclose in the many columns she wrote on the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Maggie brought the word &#8220;bigot&#8221; into it, by saying that the people who opposed mixed-race marriages in the early half of the century were bigots (because their moral beliefs were wrong) and Maggie and her ilk are not bigots (because their moral beliefs are right.)  </p>
<p>She doesn&#8217;t really provide a way to distinguish bigots from non-bigots, except to repeat two fallacies:<br />
1.) The majority of a population cannot be bigoted.<br />
and<br />
2.) People motivated by religious beliefs cannot be bigoted.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true that she likes to present herself as thoughtful and reasoned.  I felt she lost all credibility when it was discovered that she had been covertly paid to promote the Bush administration&#8217;s marriage agenda, a fact which she did not immediately disclose in the many columns she wrote on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Garrett</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/15/2026/comment-page-1#comment-10920</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/15/2026#comment-10920</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Why then would Gallagher say these untruthful things?&lt;/i&gt;

Hate.  Hold it in your heart long enough, and eventually it eats everything in it that was ever you.  The Enemy is all there is, and the war all that ever was.  The world is that which is with you, and that which is against you.  No weapon is too contemptible, no virtue more noble.  You become the weapon, and the only morality a weapon has is whatever the hand that holds it has.  Hate.  Hate.

I expect we&#039;ll be seeing a lot of it in the coming weeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Why then would Gallagher say these untruthful things?</i></p>
<p>Hate.  Hold it in your heart long enough, and eventually it eats everything in it that was ever you.  The Enemy is all there is, and the war all that ever was.  The world is that which is with you, and that which is against you.  No weapon is too contemptible, no virtue more noble.  You become the weapon, and the only morality a weapon has is whatever the hand that holds it has.  Hate.  Hate.</p>
<p>I expect we&#8217;ll be seeing a lot of it in the coming weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a. mcewen</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/15/2026/comment-page-1#comment-10909</link>
		<dc:creator>a. mcewen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 21:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/05/15/2026#comment-10909</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not saying this to say &quot;I told you so,&quot; but on the last post regarding Gallagher, I did say that the same argument she dredged up about the ruling in California exists in all of her writings regarding marriage equality:

“Judges and politicians like that imply that the 60 percent of black Americans and 60 percent of white Americans in a November Pew poll who say they oppose gay marriage must be motivated by ‘animus.’ Translation? You’re a bigot.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not saying this to say &#8220;I told you so,&#8221; but on the last post regarding Gallagher, I did say that the same argument she dredged up about the ruling in California exists in all of her writings regarding marriage equality:</p>
<p>“Judges and politicians like that imply that the 60 percent of black Americans and 60 percent of white Americans in a November Pew poll who say they oppose gay marriage must be motivated by ‘animus.’ Translation? You’re a bigot.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

