I just looked up the California forms for filing an annulment. There is no checkbox for indicating whether or not the marriage was consummated. I guess they forgot to put that on there?

I’m so sorry. Really. Please do not blame Baltimore. Our idiots may be a tad dumber then other cities but our beehive hairdos and crab cakes make up for that.

Anyway. I didn’t think the law specifically stated that the marriage must be consummated to be final. I also thought annulment was something the church gave you, while the state gave you a divorce. My father (a Roman Catholic) received a divorce from his first wife (a devout Roman Catholic), but the marriage was never annulled since it was obviously consummated (my two half-sisters, as evidence). My father considered the divorce final, but his former wife still considers herself bound to him because it was never annulled. Pretty clear to me that the church and state are separate when it comes to the subject of marriage already.

I would have to say the dumbest one is that families will fall apart if gay people are allowed to marry. Doesn’t say much for your average run of heterosexual parenting.

but it does give me an idea. can we have a contest and maybe a vote on the dumbest one? Winner gets one week in Porno Pete’s utopia.

2nd place gets two weeks.

http://www.examiner.com/a…_physically_possible.html

Thanks for the link to the LA Times Ronald George coverage. Considering his stances through his tenure, he is now quite an evenly robed California super-star.

As far as consumating gay marriage; After a good dick/ass fest, I think we should add a second asset, a little more flair, by requiring a shop fest by cashing in gift cards from marraige attendees at Macy’s, Crate’n Barrel or Bloomingdales, or any similar tag. Doing both might signify a longer marriage prospect.

We are creating history here, these things do need consideration, donchyathink?

Thanks for your great coverage Jim.

Devlin Bach