half the research is being conducted by gay people

I believe that was first said by Michael Bailey, that “liberal” self-promoting sex researcher. But I just can’t see what’s wrong with that. If gay people are not to be trusted in talking about gay people, why should we consider straight people to be any more reliable?

This is the sort of predatory nature of the ex gay industry that makes them similar to drug dealers.
They offer a cure all for ‘struggles’ and ‘addiction’ to homosexuality, with no accountability.
Struggle is a part of life, but diverting it to one’s homosexuality is grossly irresponsible and if NARTH doesn’t deliver, their disclaimer will further blame it on who accessed their services to begin with.
Which won’t be cheap in a country with so many poor people.
And it’s a good bet that it’s the gay folks who might be disproportionately among the poor of that country.

They haven’t weighed in on the polygamist revelation in Texas and the Four Corners.
With so many households being WOMAN heavy with mothers and virtually not enough father-you’d think that their own theories about what causes homosexuality would be commented on in this regard.
Wish vulnerability didn’t make people lose their intelligence and put NARTH and every concern like them in their place.
The dustbin of socio political and therapeutic failures.