<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LaBarbera Award: Judge Bill Graves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/06/05/2164/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/06/05/2164</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:29:28 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Johno</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/06/05/2164/comment-page-1#comment-11749</link>
		<dc:creator>Johno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 05:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/06/05/2164#comment-11749</guid>
		<description>How does a judge who does not know current law or understand the concepts of consent and separation of church and state get to remain a judge?

He is basically stating that because of his personal religious beliefs, he wants to retain the right to tear a child away from his/her family for no other reason except homosexuality. First we have to cater to fundie pharmacists who can&#039;t do their jobs, and now this?

He also implies that the law would protect pedophiles, which is disingenuous at best; propaganda from the bench. This is our legal system?

Evil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does a judge who does not know current law or understand the concepts of consent and separation of church and state get to remain a judge?</p>
<p>He is basically stating that because of his personal religious beliefs, he wants to retain the right to tear a child away from his/her family for no other reason except homosexuality. First we have to cater to fundie pharmacists who can&#8217;t do their jobs, and now this?</p>
<p>He also implies that the law would protect pedophiles, which is disingenuous at best; propaganda from the bench. This is our legal system?</p>
<p>Evil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Burroway</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/06/05/2164/comment-page-1#comment-11733</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Burroway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/06/05/2164#comment-11733</guid>
		<description>I happen to know that Tulsa is a very cool and LGBT-friendly city.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I happen to know that Tulsa is a very cool and LGBT-friendly city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fannie</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/06/05/2164/comment-page-1#comment-11730</link>
		<dc:creator>fannie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/06/05/2164#comment-11730</guid>
		<description>&quot;&#039;Sexual orientation&#039; would protect pedophiles, polygamists and homosexuals who practice anal sodomy&quot;

So, he doesn&#039;t have a problem with pedophiles and polygamists who do not practice anal sodomy then?

Weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8216;Sexual orientation&#8217; would protect pedophiles, polygamists and homosexuals who practice anal sodomy&#8221;</p>
<p>So, he doesn&#8217;t have a problem with pedophiles and polygamists who do not practice anal sodomy then?</p>
<p>Weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jodene</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/06/05/2164/comment-page-1#comment-11729</link>
		<dc:creator>Jodene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/06/05/2164#comment-11729</guid>
		<description>Oh, good grief. PLEASE do not think all we Oklahomans agree with this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, good grief. PLEASE do not think all we Oklahomans agree with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
