<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BREAKING: Arizona Senate Rejects Anti-Marriage Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/06/25/2272/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/06/25/2272</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:03:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Burroway</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/06/25/2272/comment-page-1#comment-12675</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Burroway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 04:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/06/25/2272#comment-12675</guid>
		<description>I would agree that this is not over. It won&#039;t be over until the &quot;sine die,&quot; which can&#039;t come too soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree that this is not over. It won&#8217;t be over until the &#8220;sine die,&#8221; which can&#8217;t come too soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pogovio</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/06/25/2272/comment-page-1#comment-12671</link>
		<dc:creator>pogovio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 03:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/06/25/2272#comment-12671</guid>
		<description>My point in the post above is, we shouldn&#039;t start the celebration just yet. This 14-11 vote may be just a holding pattern, not a defeat, for the Republicans. They may be set up for a sure win as soon as Karen Johnson gets back from vacation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point in the post above is, we shouldn&#8217;t start the celebration just yet. This 14-11 vote may be just a holding pattern, not a defeat, for the Republicans. They may be set up for a sure win as soon as Karen Johnson gets back from vacation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pogovio</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/06/25/2272/comment-page-1#comment-12669</link>
		<dc:creator>pogovio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 03:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/06/25/2272#comment-12669</guid>
		<description>The failure of this bill is being blamed on the absense of Republican Sen. Karen Johnson. But the Senate has 30 members, so there were 5 missing votes.

I suspect there&#039;s a convoluted parliamentary maneuver going on here. You mentioned 16 votes were needed for passage - that&#039;s an absolute majority (16 out full membership of 30), not a simple majority (majority of those voting). 

In some legislatures (including the U.S. congress), the losing side can ask for a re-vote, so maybe 4 of the missing votes were Republicans who would have voted for the bill, but that would have given them a 15-14 win, not enough to put the amendment on the ballot, but depriving them of the right to ask for a re-vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The failure of this bill is being blamed on the absense of Republican Sen. Karen Johnson. But the Senate has 30 members, so there were 5 missing votes.</p>
<p>I suspect there&#8217;s a convoluted parliamentary maneuver going on here. You mentioned 16 votes were needed for passage &#8211; that&#8217;s an absolute majority (16 out full membership of 30), not a simple majority (majority of those voting). </p>
<p>In some legislatures (including the U.S. congress), the losing side can ask for a re-vote, so maybe 4 of the missing votes were Republicans who would have voted for the bill, but that would have given them a 15-14 win, not enough to put the amendment on the ballot, but depriving them of the right to ask for a re-vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bigots of Arizona planning huge whine-fest&#8230; &#171; break the terror</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/06/25/2272/comment-page-1#comment-12651</link>
		<dc:creator>Bigots of Arizona planning huge whine-fest&#8230; &#171; break the terror</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/06/25/2272#comment-12651</guid>
		<description>[...] (h/t Box Turtle) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (h/t Box Turtle) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/06/25/2272/comment-page-1#comment-12648</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/06/25/2272#comment-12648</guid>
		<description>Good job Arizona!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job Arizona!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

