<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the Church Listening?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/07/11/2345/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/07/11/2345</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:32:02 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ephilei</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/07/11/2345/comment-page-1#comment-13339</link>
		<dc:creator>Ephilei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/07/11/2345#comment-13339</guid>
		<description>As a non-straight Christian considering fellowship with Anglicans, I find this helpful. Was there any such literature from a pro-gay perspective at Lambeth? Or anything pro-gay allowed? So far my impression of the ability of Lambeth to listen has been piss poor.

Discussing the genetics and neuroscience of homosexuality are pointless unless compared with what the Bible says causes the immorality that it condemns, the behavior anti-gays assume is identical with modern homosexuality. The Church condemns other feelings that are strongly influenced by genetics like addictions are rightly so. What will change people&#039;s minds, as it did mine, was realizing that the same sex behavior in Bible is completely unlike what we&#039;re advocating today and therefore not unBiblical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a non-straight Christian considering fellowship with Anglicans, I find this helpful. Was there any such literature from a pro-gay perspective at Lambeth? Or anything pro-gay allowed? So far my impression of the ability of Lambeth to listen has been piss poor.</p>
<p>Discussing the genetics and neuroscience of homosexuality are pointless unless compared with what the Bible says causes the immorality that it condemns, the behavior anti-gays assume is identical with modern homosexuality. The Church condemns other feelings that are strongly influenced by genetics like addictions are rightly so. What will change people&#8217;s minds, as it did mine, was realizing that the same sex behavior in Bible is completely unlike what we&#8217;re advocating today and therefore not unBiblical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben in Oakland</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/07/11/2345/comment-page-1#comment-13336</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben in Oakland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/07/11/2345#comment-13336</guid>
		<description>Beautiful</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
