Comments on: AFA’s Latest Email Perfectly Illustrates Their Fixation With Man On Man Sex

By: Leo

Leo — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:18:02 +0000

I read the original story from June 7.

Elmer Gantry lives. Teary eyed assistant store manager? Makes a reference to a child being molested in the bathroom. A salacious detail that doesn’t appear in later tellings. Probably because he realized that police records can be checked. So if that was made up why not the whole thing?

By: Thomas

Thomas — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:46:12 +0000

Wait so if I understand this correctly father and son see a picture of a naked man and fatehr begins to fret. Also, if the book was open, the cover denoting it as refering to gay sex would only be discernable if said father stopped to examine the book.

So really the argument is that seeing a picture of a naked man would damge his son? Do they own a mirror in the house?

I have never understood the American taboo regarding the human body. A man can walk down the steet without a shirt no problem but a woman is “indecently exposing” herself for baring her chest. C’mon, lighten up; it’s just some skin.

By: Emily K

Emily K — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:17:17 +0000

let me guess as to who that homosexual writer is…

By: Ephilei

Ephilei — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:41:53 +0000

"In today's program, Brannon exposes that lie that Hitler killed homosexuals. Even a homosexual writer admits that is false." sourece

By: Johno

Johno — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:18:25 +0000

Yes, you don’t have to be a brain surgeon to know that there are ten times as many books in any bookstore about heterosexual sex acts. But only the gay ones need to be quarantined? Amazingly, accidental exposure to dad’s Playboy and Hustler collection much earlier than 11 somehow didn’t cause my eyes to bleed or turn me straight. Go figure.

Next up from the AFA: Homosexuals and/or child predators are breathing the same planetary oxygen as your children! Donate now!!

By: NG

NG — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:49:30 +0000

It’s not a question of certain books being easily accessible; this was a hit, Emily.

By: Emily K

Emily K — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:07:34 +0000

Look, if I had an 11-year old kid, I wouldn’t want them to have such easy access to graphic images, and I know that AS an 11-year old kid, I did not want to SEE graphic images. Gay or Straight.

This is not a justification of the AFA’s actions. It is an opinion.

By: Timothy Kincaid

Timothy Kincaid — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:01:52 +0000

Here’s the original story from June 7

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=131180

By: NG

NG — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:56:10 +0000

Yeah but that was after he went apeshit on B&N and gays:

http://www.zshare.net/audio/152577834a970095/

By: Jarred

Jarred — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:39:39 +0000

In fairness to Brannon Howse, he does bring up the issue of “heterosexual pornography” being equally accessible in Barnes and Noble. It was the AFA’s choice to drop that part and focus solely on the gay angle.

Granted, there’s plenty of other reasons to criticize Howse’s reaction to the incident with his son. But he can’t be criticized for ignoring the ease o access heterosexual sex manuals.