<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Porno Pete Earns His Nickname</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/07/23/2418/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/07/23/2418</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:07:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/07/23/2418/comment-page-1#comment-14094</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/07/23/2418#comment-14094</guid>
		<description>I just typed &quot;gay military porn&quot; into google and Gay Pervs was the second site linked.  It&#039;s possible that LaBarbera did the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just typed &#8220;gay military porn&#8221; into google and Gay Pervs was the second site linked.  It&#8217;s possible that LaBarbera did the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben in Oakland</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/07/23/2418/comment-page-1#comment-14093</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben in Oakland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/07/23/2418#comment-14093</guid>
		<description>Actually, now that I think about it...

Benkof had a column on his gaysdefendmarriage.com website about how it was so necessary to &quot;clean up&quot; (his words, if i remember correctly) gay porn-- not of the men doing the nasty-- I guess that part was ok with him, especially if it is the sort of thing you like to look at-- but of the fetish fantasy stuff like calling your boyfriend &#039;daddy&#039; and so forth. No call to clean up straight porn, of course. I guess doing the MILF thing is also ok-- after, since it&#039;s striaght, it must be normal.

The whole thing was just too ridiculous. the whole point of porn is thatti is all about fantasy, sexual archetypes, and so on. I would no more want to have sex with my father than I would with Richard &quot;Dick&quot; Cheney.

Yet here is The Little Peter just sure that military fantasies, or straight fantasies (check out brokestraightboys.com)-- however few or many people actually visit the wesbites, have those fantasies, or have any desire to act them out-- are some final indicator of what would happen if gay people were in the military. (Again, I guess women just don&#039;t matter, especially if one does not appear to be actually interested in them, let alone interested in girl-on-girl military action).

Is there a militarydykes.com for women who have military fantasies. (No there isn&#039;t. I checked). And to find it, I guess you would have to do some extensive web searching, just like The Little Peter. And even then, they would be...what? Camouflage cuties with blond hair, no pubes, and 4 in spike heels?

Can you spell-- projection?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, now that I think about it&#8230;</p>
<p>Benkof had a column on his gaysdefendmarriage.com website about how it was so necessary to &#8220;clean up&#8221; (his words, if i remember correctly) gay porn&#8211; not of the men doing the nasty&#8211; I guess that part was ok with him, especially if it is the sort of thing you like to look at&#8211; but of the fetish fantasy stuff like calling your boyfriend &#8216;daddy&#8217; and so forth. No call to clean up straight porn, of course. I guess doing the MILF thing is also ok&#8211; after, since it&#8217;s striaght, it must be normal.</p>
<p>The whole thing was just too ridiculous. the whole point of porn is thatti is all about fantasy, sexual archetypes, and so on. I would no more want to have sex with my father than I would with Richard &#8220;Dick&#8221; Cheney.</p>
<p>Yet here is The Little Peter just sure that military fantasies, or straight fantasies (check out brokestraightboys.com)&#8211; however few or many people actually visit the wesbites, have those fantasies, or have any desire to act them out&#8211; are some final indicator of what would happen if gay people were in the military. (Again, I guess women just don&#8217;t matter, especially if one does not appear to be actually interested in them, let alone interested in girl-on-girl military action).</p>
<p>Is there a militarydykes.com for women who have military fantasies. (No there isn&#8217;t. I checked). And to find it, I guess you would have to do some extensive web searching, just like The Little Peter. And even then, they would be&#8230;what? Camouflage cuties with blond hair, no pubes, and 4 in spike heels?</p>
<p>Can you spell&#8211; projection?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garrett O'Neal</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/07/23/2418/comment-page-1#comment-14092</link>
		<dc:creator>Garrett O'Neal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/07/23/2418#comment-14092</guid>
		<description>Wow, upon reading this post, I viewed their webpage.  What actually motivates these people to be so hateful?  They say they are taking a stand for themselves, but they sure are being contradictive and hypocritical the way they execute their actions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, upon reading this post, I viewed their webpage.  What actually motivates these people to be so hateful?  They say they are taking a stand for themselves, but they sure are being contradictive and hypocritical the way they execute their actions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben in Oakland</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/07/23/2418/comment-page-1#comment-14088</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben in Oakland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/07/23/2418#comment-14088</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s clear The Little Peter has an obsession with gay sex, but even more clear that he has a jesus complex. He&#039;s looking at all that gay porn so that YOU DON&#039;T HAVE TO-- sort of like J taking it on the chin for all humanity&#039;s sake.

I think The Little Peter should get an award, or at least a religion named after him.

It would be just PE-TERRIFIC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s clear The Little Peter has an obsession with gay sex, but even more clear that he has a jesus complex. He&#8217;s looking at all that gay porn so that YOU DON&#8217;T HAVE TO&#8211; sort of like J taking it on the chin for all humanity&#8217;s sake.</p>
<p>I think The Little Peter should get an award, or at least a religion named after him.</p>
<p>It would be just PE-TERRIFIC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ in Chicago</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/07/23/2418/comment-page-1#comment-14079</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ in Chicago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/07/23/2418#comment-14079</guid>
		<description>Not just his browser bookmarks!

His browser cache is no doubt XXX rated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not just his browser bookmarks!</p>
<p>His browser cache is no doubt XXX rated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/07/23/2418/comment-page-1#comment-14076</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/07/23/2418#comment-14076</guid>
		<description>Pete&#039;s got a tough job, but somebody has to do it. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete&#8217;s got a tough job, but somebody has to do it. :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
