NO MORE PERSONAL INSULTS!!

They will be deleted.

That’s some hefty logic there. Obama can’t be elected not because he isn’t qualified, not because he has poor plans or stands incorrectly on issues you support, no he must not be elected because SOME (note that word, you should use it more often) of the people who support him are saying awful things.

Excuse me, if obama can be condemned by Daily Kos, then John, McCain is in even more trouble due to the Freepers. There is NOTHING but venom at that site. They don’t even pretend to be fair and balanced.

“As far as I’m concerned the civil war amongst the cons in the GOP is on hold while we keep you slimey bastards out of office.”

Gross generalizations help no one.

And by your own admission, Obama (who IS running for office) is not the one making these slimey comments. It is SOME of his supporters (who are not running for office).

Holding Obama liable for the actions of his supporters is JUST as stupid as holding Sarah Palin responsible for the actions of her daughter.
What exactly is Obama supposed to do, lock them up, ground them, send them to bed without dinner? What possible control does he have over these people?

I know you don’t like Obama, we’ve agreed to disagree on that. But I’m a liberal and an Obama supporter. You don’t know me, I am not a twisted freak, or a slimey bastard. You can check my blog, linked above, I’ve said nothing about Palin or her daughter. Hell I’ve barely mentioned the election until recently.

If you don’t like being painted with a broad brush, don’t do it to other people.

As far as I’m concerned the civil war amongst the cons in the GOP is on hold while we keep you slimey bastards out of office.

In the mean time I’ll check out her background from Alaska and make my judgment from that.

(1)Obama does have executive experience, in fact, more than Palin does. It just wasn’t executive experience as a lawmaker or at a for-profit institution. He was president of the Law Review at Harvard, and was a director, or on the board of directors of many organizations for years before becoming a state senator. It’s dishonest to say he’s never had any executive experience. The amount of executive experience isn’t the only thing that counts any way, after all, Bush had plenty of executive experience — unfortunately he ran virtually every company into the ground and had to be bailed out. Perhaps Obama’s experience is not the type you value, but it’s not the same as zero experience.

Even better, Palin visited wounded troops in Germany this past summer while Obama was just too damn busy. How do you think that’s gonna play with your Bubba Joe voter? Not very well.

2) You’re ignoring the fact that Obama visited troops in afghanistan and iraq — and just as Palin was visiting in her capacity as governor, Obama was visiting in his capacity as a senator. The germany visit was part of his campaign travels, funded by him, not by the taxpayers and thus, is subject to completely different set of rules. If he had visited the troops in Germany, I’m sure someone would be saying that he used his senate credentials during his campaign tour to visit troops –implying something unethical on Obama’s part. Get off the troops thing, Palin and Obama have both visited troops, they’re equal on that part.

Oh and as for national security experience, neither Obama or Biden served in the military themselves, like McCain did.

(3)McCain served in the military. He spent a whopping 20 hours in combat the whole war, graduated almost last in his class (790 out of 795) at the naval academy, and never lead a combat or peace time unit. But you seem to be implying that being in the military somehow would make someone better at running it. Perhaps, or perhaps not.

We get it, you don’t like Obama, you’re not voting for him. It’s a free country, do as you please. However, don’t present incomplete details unless you want to be called on them.