<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arizona Republic Says No to Prop 102</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/10/20/3965/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/10/20/3965</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:03:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaft</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/10/20/3965/comment-page-1#comment-19320</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=3965#comment-19320</guid>
		<description>The end of that editorial scares me.

&quot;Arizona could use strong advocates of marriage. They should spend their time and energy hunting for real ways to shore it up. Proposition 102 is a needless distraction. Voters should reject it.&quot;

After just remarking about other same-sex unions, that says to me, &quot;We don&#039;t need Prop. 102 but we need to go about in a more efficient and perminate way to elimate homosexuals from entering into unions.&quot; This&#039;ll help the fight against 102, but I pray this editorial isn&#039;t prophetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The end of that editorial scares me.</p>
<p>&#8220;Arizona could use strong advocates of marriage. They should spend their time and energy hunting for real ways to shore it up. Proposition 102 is a needless distraction. Voters should reject it.&#8221;</p>
<p>After just remarking about other same-sex unions, that says to me, &#8220;We don&#8217;t need Prop. 102 but we need to go about in a more efficient and perminate way to elimate homosexuals from entering into unions.&#8221; This&#8217;ll help the fight against 102, but I pray this editorial isn&#8217;t prophetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

