<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Florida and Arizona Anti-Gay Activists Use Same Media Company</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/10/20/3975/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/10/20/3975</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 22:00:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louie</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/10/20/3975/comment-page-1#comment-19351</link>
		<dc:creator>Louie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 05:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=3975#comment-19351</guid>
		<description>Very interesting. Some numbers don&#039;t seem to add up. This is what I was able to dip up from the public records for Prop. 102 in Arizona and Amendment 2 in Florida:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;Advertising Company for Prop. 102 in Arizona&lt;/b&gt;:
Design4 Advertising
106 N Collins St, Plant City, FL 33563
Purpose : Communications - Advertising
08/15/08 - $225,000.00
08/21/08 - $150,000.00
08/28/08 - $500,000.00
08/29/08 - $112,000.00
09/11/08 - $1,322,000.00
&lt;b&gt;$2,309,000.00&lt;/b&gt; - Cycle to date (09/22/08)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Still with me? &lt;b&gt;Yes on Prop. 102&lt;/b&gt; has spent over &lt;b&gt;$2 Million&lt;/b&gt; dollars on advertising using the &lt;b&gt;&quot;Design4 Advertising&quot;&lt;/b&gt; company based out of &lt;b&gt;Florida!&lt;/b&gt; Hmmm, Florida. Over $2 Million dollars! Wow! You would think that with the State of Arizona being about &lt;b&gt;$3 Billion&lt;/b&gt; dollars in the red, yes on Prop. 102 would show some Arizona PRIDE and buy &lt;b&gt;LOCAL&lt;/b&gt;?!

Anyway, this is what I was able to dig up for the yes on Amendment 2 committee in Florida:
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;Advertising Company for Amendment 2 in Florida&lt;/b&gt;:
Design4 Advertising (Also spelled as &quot;DESIGN FOR ADVERTISING&quot;)
106 N COLLINS ST
PLANT CITY, FL 33563

Date:	Paid To:			Amount:		Purpose:
04/24/08	DESIGN4 ADVERTISING	$3,000.00		CONSULTING
08/14/08 	DESIGN4 ADVERTISING	$500.00		ADVERTISING
09/18/08	CCADVERTISING		$5,000.00		ADVERTISING
09/25/08	GOOD NEWS		$2,050.00		ADVERTISING
09/30/08	MAS COMMUNICATIONS	$22,000.00	ADVERTISING
10/07/08	MAS COMMUNICATIONS	$6,000.00		ADVERTISING
10/08/08	DESIGN FOR ADVERTISING	$50,000.00	ADVERTISING&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I added up the numbers and the campaign for yes on Amendment 2 in Florida has only spent &lt;b&gt;$88,550.00&lt;/b&gt; It seems the biggest bulk of their money has been spent on a company named &lt;b&gt;&quot;THE BROADCAST TEAM&quot;&lt;/b&gt; doing direct mailings. To the tune of &lt;b&gt;$378,725.00&lt;/b&gt;

Something doesn&#039;t seem right.

Also, the &lt;b&gt;yes on Prop. 102&lt;/b&gt; campaign has paid out $171.00 in bank fees to Bank of America in Florida?!

They also paid $258.07 to PODS for storage space in Florida?

Amazing how much interplay there is amongst these two campaigns that are over 2,000 miles away from each other.

California - Vote &quot;NO&quot; on Prop. 8!
Arizona - Vote &quot;NO&quot; on Prop. 102! AGAIN!
Florida - Vote &quot;NO&quot; on Amendment 2!
Connecticut - Vote &quot;NO&quot; on Question 1!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting. Some numbers don&#8217;t seem to add up. This is what I was able to dip up from the public records for Prop. 102 in Arizona and Amendment 2 in Florida:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>Advertising Company for Prop. 102 in Arizona</b>:<br />
Design4 Advertising<br />
106 N Collins St, Plant City, FL 33563<br />
Purpose : Communications &#8211; Advertising<br />
08/15/08 &#8211; $225,000.00<br />
08/21/08 &#8211; $150,000.00<br />
08/28/08 &#8211; $500,000.00<br />
08/29/08 &#8211; $112,000.00<br />
09/11/08 &#8211; $1,322,000.00<br />
<b>$2,309,000.00</b> &#8211; Cycle to date (09/22/08)</p></blockquote>
<p>Still with me? <b>Yes on Prop. 102</b> has spent over <b>$2 Million</b> dollars on advertising using the <b>&#8220;Design4 Advertising&#8221;</b> company based out of <b>Florida!</b> Hmmm, Florida. Over $2 Million dollars! Wow! You would think that with the State of Arizona being about <b>$3 Billion</b> dollars in the red, yes on Prop. 102 would show some Arizona PRIDE and buy <b>LOCAL</b>?!</p>
<p>Anyway, this is what I was able to dig up for the yes on Amendment 2 committee in Florida:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>Advertising Company for Amendment 2 in Florida</b>:<br />
Design4 Advertising (Also spelled as &#8220;DESIGN FOR ADVERTISING&#8221;)<br />
106 N COLLINS ST<br />
PLANT CITY, FL 33563</p>
<p>Date:	Paid To:			Amount:		Purpose:<br />
04/24/08	DESIGN4 ADVERTISING	$3,000.00		CONSULTING<br />
08/14/08 	DESIGN4 ADVERTISING	$500.00		ADVERTISING<br />
09/18/08	CCADVERTISING		$5,000.00		ADVERTISING<br />
09/25/08	GOOD NEWS		$2,050.00		ADVERTISING<br />
09/30/08	MAS COMMUNICATIONS	$22,000.00	ADVERTISING<br />
10/07/08	MAS COMMUNICATIONS	$6,000.00		ADVERTISING<br />
10/08/08	DESIGN FOR ADVERTISING	$50,000.00	ADVERTISING</p></blockquote>
<p>I added up the numbers and the campaign for yes on Amendment 2 in Florida has only spent <b>$88,550.00</b> It seems the biggest bulk of their money has been spent on a company named <b>&#8220;THE BROADCAST TEAM&#8221;</b> doing direct mailings. To the tune of <b>$378,725.00</b></p>
<p>Something doesn&#8217;t seem right.</p>
<p>Also, the <b>yes on Prop. 102</b> campaign has paid out $171.00 in bank fees to Bank of America in Florida?!</p>
<p>They also paid $258.07 to PODS for storage space in Florida?</p>
<p>Amazing how much interplay there is amongst these two campaigns that are over 2,000 miles away from each other.</p>
<p>California &#8211; Vote &#8220;NO&#8221; on Prop. 8!<br />
Arizona &#8211; Vote &#8220;NO&#8221; on Prop. 102! AGAIN!<br />
Florida &#8211; Vote &#8220;NO&#8221; on Amendment 2!<br />
Connecticut &#8211; Vote &#8220;NO&#8221; on Question 1!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/10/20/3975/comment-page-1#comment-19331</link>
		<dc:creator>johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 23:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=3975#comment-19331</guid>
		<description>Find out who owns the media company they&#039;re using.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Find out who owns the media company they&#8217;re using.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
