…nor do you share the same ideas of monogomy.

First off, you misspelled “monogamy”. Sorry, blame my honors English teacher. And English wasn’t even my FIRST language! DOH!

As far as I knew, there is and always has been only 1 definition for “monogamy”. Unless something has changed or us “gays” are supposed to use an alternate dictionary, my definition for “monogamy” is the following:

Monogamy:
The practice of having sex with only one partner.

For this example, I used the definition from WebMD one of the world’s most popular medical websites.

Hmm, their definition for “monogamy” is exactly what I thought “monogamy” meant as well.

So, let’s apply this “definition” to a real world example.

My “husband” and I have been married for the past 12 years in our hearts and “legally” in California for the past 4 months.

In the past 12 years, I have ONLY had sex with ONE person, my beloved.

In the past 12 years, my beloved has ONLY had sex with ONE person, me.

This certainly seems to qualify as “monogamy” to me.

And you get to vote on whether or not I deserve to get “civil” rights under the eyes of the law of the State of California?!

“Beam me up, Scotty!”

California – Vote “NO” on Prop. 8!
Arizona – Vote “NO” on Prop. 102! AGAIN!
Florida – Vote “NO” on Amendment 2!
Connecticut – Vote “NO” on Question 1!

thanks for clairfying. It is truly all aobut prejudice for you, isn’t it? “You just want the same rights and privileges as (white people) (Christians)(English speakers)(Men)… but you’re not blah blahblah.

It’s all about the myth of heterosexual superiority in service to the reality of heterosexual privilege to enforce the myth of heterosexual hegemony.

honey, you’re just heterosexual. you’re not special. You’re not normal, just common.

A common heterosexual, a common bigot.

Maybe someday you’ll look yourslef in the mirror and wonder why you ever thought that hating a whole group of people you don’t know and know nothing about qualifies you as a decent human being.

I’m really surprised heterosexuals suddenly got this lock on monogamy–when’d that happen, and hets also suddenly established that as the exclusive claim to marriage. Guess that teevee show about Het Swinging is 100% whole cloth fabrication.

And what does “do not share same bodies” mean?

I wouldn’t get hung up on similarities being exclusive locks on marriage…millions of dollars have been made on books written about dissimilarities. By your statements about “having the same ____” men and women shouldn’t be allowed to marry.

I mean, at least I can share my partner’s clothing and not feel ill-fittingly uncomfortable. We’re similar in body type. That much is the same…can we get married, now, and when do we get to vote on yours?