<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mesa May Consider Domestic Partnerships</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/01/07/7832/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/01/07/7832</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:17:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/01/07/7832/comment-page-1#comment-30139</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=7832#comment-30139</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s great. Not just for gays, but for every unmarried couple who wants benefits.

People who oppose it are not neccesarily homophobic, they just believe in traditional marriage, and they also oppose these partnership benefits for anybody else. I understand that position, not agree with it.

But I think something like this will help gays alot and a increase the chance of more pro-gay laws to pass nationwide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s great. Not just for gays, but for every unmarried couple who wants benefits.</p>
<p>People who oppose it are not neccesarily homophobic, they just believe in traditional marriage, and they also oppose these partnership benefits for anybody else. I understand that position, not agree with it.</p>
<p>But I think something like this will help gays alot and a increase the chance of more pro-gay laws to pass nationwide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John B</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/01/07/7832/comment-page-1#comment-30026</link>
		<dc:creator>John B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 05:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=7832#comment-30026</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but I don&#039;t consider this (or the Phoenix domestic partner registry) to be much of a step forward....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but I don&#8217;t consider this (or the Phoenix domestic partner registry) to be much of a step forward&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
