http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/01/29/8479 News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric Sat, 18 May 2013 21:32:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/01/29/8479/comment-page-1#comment-32147 Duncan Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:01:48 +0000 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=8479#comment-32147 Are Common-law marriages similar to the procedure, peculiar to Scotland, of marriage by habit and repute? Come to think of it, could habit and repute bypass gender restrictions over here? Are Common-law marriages similar to the procedure, peculiar to Scotland, of marriage by habit and repute? Come to think of it, could habit and repute bypass gender restrictions over here?

]]> http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/01/29/8479/comment-page-1#comment-32120 Ephilei Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:33:17 +0000 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=8479#comment-32120 So . . . are they married? Besides their origin, is there a difference (now) between common law marriage and typical marriage? Will a lesbian, common law couple be referred to as "wife and wife?" So . . . are they married? Besides their origin, is there a difference (now) between common law marriage and typical marriage? Will a lesbian, common law couple be referred to as “wife and wife?”

]]> http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/01/29/8479/comment-page-1#comment-32105 Joel Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:46:46 +0000 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=8479#comment-32105 So in some sense** So in some sense**

]]> http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/01/29/8479/comment-page-1#comment-32104 Joel Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:46:26 +0000 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=8479#comment-32104 So is some sense, if it would be the next state to recognize marriage, even though not conventionally? So is some sense, if it would be the next state to recognize marriage, even though not conventionally?

]]>