<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Republican Party Resists Moving Further Anti-Gay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/01/30/8487/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/01/30/8487</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/01/30/8487/comment-page-1#comment-32521</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 03:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=8487#comment-32521</guid>
		<description>Sorry folks he&#039;s just as much of a cave-dweller asthe rest of the Republican party.  They ONLY picked Steele because he&#039;s black and they just down understand why Obama was elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry folks he&#8217;s just as much of a cave-dweller asthe rest of the Republican party.  They ONLY picked Steele because he&#8217;s black and they just down understand why Obama was elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Garrett</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/01/30/8487/comment-page-1#comment-32246</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 05:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=8487#comment-32246</guid>
		<description>On the other hand...over at Pam&#039;s House Blend I just saw a post about how David Duke is having an absolute cow about this...so it&#039;s not all bad...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the other hand&#8230;over at Pam&#8217;s House Blend I just saw a post about how David Duke is having an absolute cow about this&#8230;so it&#8217;s not all bad&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Garrett</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/01/30/8487/comment-page-1#comment-32187</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 12:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=8487#comment-32187</guid>
		<description>Steele is no friend to gay people.  I live in Maryland, and I watched his campaigns during the Governor&#039;s race in 2002, when he was Robert Ehrlich&#039;s choice for Lieutenant Governor, and again his Senate campaign in 2006.  

In 2006 he made his opposition to same-sex marriage a big part of his campaign locally, and supported a state amendment banning it, along with civil unions. But the really telling moment for me was back in 2002, when he and Ehrlich were running against Democrat Kathleen Kennedy Townsend.  

In March of that year, Maryland&#039;s gay community witnessed a horror at Maryland Shock Trauma, which barred William Robert Flanigan Jr. from his dying partner&#039;s bedside, saying he was not &quot;family&quot;, and that &quot;partners&quot; did not qualify, even though he had power of attorney.  Asked during the campaign about extending state anti-discrimination laws to include gay people, Steele =instantly= replied that there were already enough laws on the books protecting &quot;gay white men&quot;.

I wish I had a link for that but I don&#039;t, but I remember it vividly.  Also the outrage on the gay listserves I was on at the time.  Steele took a question about sexual orientation, and turned it into a question about race and white privilege.  And he did it reflexively.  It just came right out of the man.

Steele puts his opposition to same-sex marriage firmly in a religious context.  He uses the same rhetoric about marriage not being a human institution, but a God ordained one, that other religious right figures use.  It&#039;s a safe bet that will not even attempt to budge his party inch on granting same-sex couples any respect in the eyes of the law.  If anything, he&#039;ll try to harden attitudes on that issue even more.  But where you really see the man in my opinion, was in 2002 when he was even opposed to including gay citizens in the state&#039;s anti-discrimination laws, and he voiced his opposition to that in a way that turned it into an issue of race.  

Let let it be said his running mate, Ehrlich, after winning the election, vetoed a very minimalist partner&#039;s registry bill that would have given same-sex couples hospital visitation rights.  If there was any difference in attitude between the two men toward gay citizens, you never saw it in public the entire time they held office together.  If all that&#039;s being said now is that Steele is no Sally Kern, that&#039;s not saying anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steele is no friend to gay people.  I live in Maryland, and I watched his campaigns during the Governor&#8217;s race in 2002, when he was Robert Ehrlich&#8217;s choice for Lieutenant Governor, and again his Senate campaign in 2006.  </p>
<p>In 2006 he made his opposition to same-sex marriage a big part of his campaign locally, and supported a state amendment banning it, along with civil unions. But the really telling moment for me was back in 2002, when he and Ehrlich were running against Democrat Kathleen Kennedy Townsend.  </p>
<p>In March of that year, Maryland&#8217;s gay community witnessed a horror at Maryland Shock Trauma, which barred William Robert Flanigan Jr. from his dying partner&#8217;s bedside, saying he was not &#8220;family&#8221;, and that &#8220;partners&#8221; did not qualify, even though he had power of attorney.  Asked during the campaign about extending state anti-discrimination laws to include gay people, Steele =instantly= replied that there were already enough laws on the books protecting &#8220;gay white men&#8221;.</p>
<p>I wish I had a link for that but I don&#8217;t, but I remember it vividly.  Also the outrage on the gay listserves I was on at the time.  Steele took a question about sexual orientation, and turned it into a question about race and white privilege.  And he did it reflexively.  It just came right out of the man.</p>
<p>Steele puts his opposition to same-sex marriage firmly in a religious context.  He uses the same rhetoric about marriage not being a human institution, but a God ordained one, that other religious right figures use.  It&#8217;s a safe bet that will not even attempt to budge his party inch on granting same-sex couples any respect in the eyes of the law.  If anything, he&#8217;ll try to harden attitudes on that issue even more.  But where you really see the man in my opinion, was in 2002 when he was even opposed to including gay citizens in the state&#8217;s anti-discrimination laws, and he voiced his opposition to that in a way that turned it into an issue of race.  </p>
<p>Let let it be said his running mate, Ehrlich, after winning the election, vetoed a very minimalist partner&#8217;s registry bill that would have given same-sex couples hospital visitation rights.  If there was any difference in attitude between the two men toward gay citizens, you never saw it in public the entire time they held office together.  If all that&#8217;s being said now is that Steele is no Sally Kern, that&#8217;s not saying anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zack</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/01/30/8487/comment-page-1#comment-32186</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 12:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=8487#comment-32186</guid>
		<description>&quot;We want you to be a part of us, we want you to with be with us, and for those who wish to obstruct, get ready to get knocked over” sounds disturbingly like &quot;it&#039;s my way or the highway&quot;. If so, then we&#039;re not seeing a huge shift away from their past policies. I remain skeptical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We want you to be a part of us, we want you to with be with us, and for those who wish to obstruct, get ready to get knocked over” sounds disturbingly like &#8220;it&#8217;s my way or the highway&#8221;. If so, then we&#8217;re not seeing a huge shift away from their past policies. I remain skeptical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quo III</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/01/30/8487/comment-page-1#comment-32166</link>
		<dc:creator>quo III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 07:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=8487#comment-32166</guid>
		<description>&quot;Resists Moving Further Anti-Gay&quot; does not make sense in English. I really don&#039;t know what it means to &quot;move&quot; further anti-gay. Where would one put it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Resists Moving Further Anti-Gay&#8221; does not make sense in English. I really don&#8217;t know what it means to &#8220;move&#8221; further anti-gay. Where would one put it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swampfox</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/01/30/8487/comment-page-1#comment-32155</link>
		<dc:creator>Swampfox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=8487#comment-32155</guid>
		<description>I am glad that he has been elected.  And, I can only pray that the Republican Party decides to become less tolerant to the anti-gay community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad that he has been elected.  And, I can only pray that the Republican Party decides to become less tolerant to the anti-gay community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayelle</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/01/30/8487/comment-page-1#comment-32154</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=8487#comment-32154</guid>
		<description>Maybe some people in the Republican Party are finally getting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe some people in the Republican Party are finally getting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonard Drake</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/01/30/8487/comment-page-1#comment-32131</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonard Drake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=8487#comment-32131</guid>
		<description>Michael Steele has been elected with, I believe, 95 votes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Steele has been elected with, I believe, 95 votes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindoro</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/01/30/8487/comment-page-1#comment-32128</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindoro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=8487#comment-32128</guid>
		<description>Steele won on the 6th round of voting. Let&#039;s hope he will be able to bring the part from the radical hatred that it embraced the last couple of years</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steele won on the 6th round of voting. Let&#8217;s hope he will be able to bring the part from the radical hatred that it embraced the last couple of years</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
