<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knoxville Shooter&#8217;s Manifesto Made Public</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/02/14/8811/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/02/14/8811</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:17:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Game Allows Players to Slaughter &#34;Tea Party Zombies&#34; Like Sarah Palin &#38; Bill O'Reily - Page 3 - Political Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/02/14/8811/comment-page-1#comment-105913</link>
		<dc:creator>Game Allows Players to Slaughter &#34;Tea Party Zombies&#34; Like Sarah Palin &#38; Bill O'Reily - Page 3 - Political Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 03:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=8811#comment-105913</guid>
		<description>[...] think a fairly generic flash game is ALOT better than the &quot;Tea Party&quot; approach:  Gunman Tells Others To Go Kill Liberals, Kill Them In The Streets, Kill Them Where they Gather.   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] think a fairly generic flash game is ALOT better than the &quot;Tea Party&quot; approach:  Gunman Tells Others To Go Kill Liberals, Kill Them In The Streets, Kill Them Where they Gather.   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/02/14/8811/comment-page-1#comment-33625</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=8811#comment-33625</guid>
		<description>Houndentenor,

Unless you can present evidence of Ann Coulter using drugs and having affairs with married men, do not make such accusations at this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Houndentenor,</p>
<p>Unless you can present evidence of Ann Coulter using drugs and having affairs with married men, do not make such accusations at this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Houndentenor</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/02/14/8811/comment-page-1#comment-33613</link>
		<dc:creator>Houndentenor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=8811#comment-33613</guid>
		<description>What Libel?  Ann isn&#039;t stupid enough to sue anyone.  The dirt on her that would come out in a trial (drug use, affairs with married men, etc) would destroy her standing with the right wing nutjobs.  Besides I think the whole thing is an act.  

Back to the main point, there are a lot more guys like this one out there.  Turn on any conservative talk radio show.  Yes, I know we liberals were all nuts after the 2004 election but we weren&#039;t armed.  It&#039;s a very different thing to organize a protest and to show up on a shooting spree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Libel?  Ann isn&#8217;t stupid enough to sue anyone.  The dirt on her that would come out in a trial (drug use, affairs with married men, etc) would destroy her standing with the right wing nutjobs.  Besides I think the whole thing is an act.  </p>
<p>Back to the main point, there are a lot more guys like this one out there.  Turn on any conservative talk radio show.  Yes, I know we liberals were all nuts after the 2004 election but we weren&#8217;t armed.  It&#8217;s a very different thing to organize a protest and to show up on a shooting spree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woozle</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/02/14/8811/comment-page-1#comment-33549</link>
		<dc:creator>Woozle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=8811#comment-33549</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why is Jason Dabrowski’s libel of Ann Coulter allowed to remain?&lt;/blockquote&gt;As Scott P. said, what libel?

I take JD&#039;s statement to mean &quot;wow, that sounds exactly like the sort of thing Ann Coulter would write&quot;. Are you saying that it isn&#039;t? Or are you reading some other claim into it? (He didn&#039;t call her ugly... unless you mean her thoughts.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why is Jason Dabrowski’s libel of Ann Coulter allowed to remain?</p></blockquote>
<p>As Scott P. said, what libel?</p>
<p>I take JD&#8217;s statement to mean &#8220;wow, that sounds exactly like the sort of thing Ann Coulter would write&#8221;. Are you saying that it isn&#8217;t? Or are you reading some other claim into it? (He didn&#8217;t call her ugly&#8230; unless you mean her thoughts.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott P.</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/02/14/8811/comment-page-1#comment-33548</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=8811#comment-33548</guid>
		<description>Libel? What libel? Just calling her ugly? Guess what? The First Amendment gives us the freedom to insult public figures. Now, as an example, and only as an example, don&#039;t get your panties in a bunch (again not a libel) if he&#039;d said she had sex with German Shepherds, THAT would be a libel, because that would not be an opinion, but a statement that implies an unprovable fact on his part, UNLESS he had pictures. Just saying he finds her ugly is NOT!

Mere opinion, and the truth, can never be considered libelous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Libel? What libel? Just calling her ugly? Guess what? The First Amendment gives us the freedom to insult public figures. Now, as an example, and only as an example, don&#8217;t get your panties in a bunch (again not a libel) if he&#8217;d said she had sex with German Shepherds, THAT would be a libel, because that would not be an opinion, but a statement that implies an unprovable fact on his part, UNLESS he had pictures. Just saying he finds her ugly is NOT!</p>
<p>Mere opinion, and the truth, can never be considered libelous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/02/14/8811/comment-page-1#comment-33536</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=8811#comment-33536</guid>
		<description>Why is Jason Dabrowski&#039;s &lt;b&gt;libel&lt;/b&gt; of Ann Coulter allowed to remain?

Is it because no one here thinks she&#039;d sue even if she noticed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is Jason Dabrowski&#8217;s <b>libel</b> of Ann Coulter allowed to remain?</p>
<p>Is it because no one here thinks she&#8217;d sue even if she noticed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regan DuCasse</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/02/14/8811/comment-page-1#comment-33468</link>
		<dc:creator>Regan DuCasse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 20:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=8811#comment-33468</guid>
		<description>Hmmm...

  With the exception of Malcom Mohammed and the LIR shooter, Curtis or something, and the Virginia Institute killings, our country has had VERY few mass shooters of color.
 But the trend is changing...

   I&#039;m not sure if this matters. But from school shootings to major mass killings that involved over 20 victims, the rampages have involved mostly white males.
Certainly all of them have been males.

   And their rage was prompted in some part by relationships or lack of them with females or some kind of outsized issue with their masculinity, like being taunted with an anti gay epithet.

  Whatever the case, it&#039;s incidents like this, or most street and domestic violence that makes the assertion that gay people are the most threatening to children or other living things patently ludicrous.

   Surely, there have been serial killers who have been gay, or identified as such after the fact, but to hear the anti gay tell it, there are FAR more mass and serial killers who have been.

 Well, MY crime data knows when that&#039;s bullshit.
My other data also knows that gay men and lesbians serve FAR more time, than heterosexuals with equivalent offenses.
Are paroled less often.
 Are executed and are given harsher sentences also.

  Commiserate with the incarceration, punishment and parole ratios of blacks.

  Also, gay and lesbian VICTIMS have less time spent on their cases, less incarceration time for their violators as well as less reporting of a crime because of fear of disclosure of their orientation.

  Some states have improved their records, somewhat.
But a perp knows he&#039;ll have less likelihood of punishment if he uses the &#039;gay panic defense&#039;, and they will be LESS inhibited to commit the crime in the first place.

   But I&#039;m sure you all know about that part.

    Just another way that gay people have similar civil and human rights violations that blacks have known in this land of equality and the free.

   Atkinsson&#039;s attitude of entitlement might have been tempered quite a bit had he not been indoctrinated to believe that men like himself are NOT God&#039;s gift to the rest of us.
 And he&#039;s not owed a thing because he thinks so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;</p>
<p>  With the exception of Malcom Mohammed and the LIR shooter, Curtis or something, and the Virginia Institute killings, our country has had VERY few mass shooters of color.<br />
 But the trend is changing&#8230;</p>
<p>   I&#8217;m not sure if this matters. But from school shootings to major mass killings that involved over 20 victims, the rampages have involved mostly white males.<br />
Certainly all of them have been males.</p>
<p>   And their rage was prompted in some part by relationships or lack of them with females or some kind of outsized issue with their masculinity, like being taunted with an anti gay epithet.</p>
<p>  Whatever the case, it&#8217;s incidents like this, or most street and domestic violence that makes the assertion that gay people are the most threatening to children or other living things patently ludicrous.</p>
<p>   Surely, there have been serial killers who have been gay, or identified as such after the fact, but to hear the anti gay tell it, there are FAR more mass and serial killers who have been.</p>
<p> Well, MY crime data knows when that&#8217;s bullshit.<br />
My other data also knows that gay men and lesbians serve FAR more time, than heterosexuals with equivalent offenses.<br />
Are paroled less often.<br />
 Are executed and are given harsher sentences also.</p>
<p>  Commiserate with the incarceration, punishment and parole ratios of blacks.</p>
<p>  Also, gay and lesbian VICTIMS have less time spent on their cases, less incarceration time for their violators as well as less reporting of a crime because of fear of disclosure of their orientation.</p>
<p>  Some states have improved their records, somewhat.<br />
But a perp knows he&#8217;ll have less likelihood of punishment if he uses the &#8216;gay panic defense&#8217;, and they will be LESS inhibited to commit the crime in the first place.</p>
<p>   But I&#8217;m sure you all know about that part.</p>
<p>    Just another way that gay people have similar civil and human rights violations that blacks have known in this land of equality and the free.</p>
<p>   Atkinsson&#8217;s attitude of entitlement might have been tempered quite a bit had he not been indoctrinated to believe that men like himself are NOT God&#8217;s gift to the rest of us.<br />
 And he&#8217;s not owed a thing because he thinks so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regan DuCasse</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/02/14/8811/comment-page-1#comment-33467</link>
		<dc:creator>Regan DuCasse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 20:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=8811#comment-33467</guid>
		<description>I waited and watched to see if the liberal bashers whose material and broadcast words this man took so seriously would even MENTION the shootings or display sympathy for the victims.
 Nope, nothing.
 Not even a word on the killing of Christians by those so convinced that this country and liberals hate Christians!
  
   I wouldn&#039;t have thought a PROMPT would be necessary. I wouldn&#039;t have thought summoning the very people who CONSTANTLY bash liberals and Democrats but can&#039;t bring themselves to have a conversation on how little difference there has been between Republicans and conservatives of late on fiscal and social policies.

    TownHall, Washington Times and WorldNetDaily on a regular basis, bash liberals.
 But ALSO bash homosexuals, in particular. Not a week goes by when TH finds some extreme leap of nonsense in which to connect gay people.

    Perhaps the wildfires in Australia as an act of a sexually frustrated gay arsonist will be next?
Any bets?

   If we blamed ALL heterosexuals or made them responsible for his actions, then they&#039;d protest at the unfairness of doing so, and assert that they don&#039;t CONDONE the actions of this person.


  However, few of them can even NAME a person or something from someone gay that went to such violent extremes connected DIRECTLY to political beliefs by prominent gay media or gay people themselves.

  As it happens, they continue to assume ALL gay people are to be held accountable not only for singular and anecdotal acts by gay people that may or may not negatively impact a straight person, but gay people are also held accountable for NOT supporting polygamy and incest and so on, but they firmly believe gay people condone pedophilia.

   I&#039;m not sure if I&#039;m making sense here.
Perhaps it&#039;s because it&#039;s so hard not to tear out your hair at how idiotic it all is, as well as dangerous.

    In that shooting was a spectacular act of heroism. One of the members of the church put himself between the shooter and other potential victims, giving them time to get to cover.

    We mentioned it in the gay media an on blogs, but the conservative media did not.

    Figures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I waited and watched to see if the liberal bashers whose material and broadcast words this man took so seriously would even MENTION the shootings or display sympathy for the victims.<br />
 Nope, nothing.<br />
 Not even a word on the killing of Christians by those so convinced that this country and liberals hate Christians!</p>
<p>   I wouldn&#8217;t have thought a PROMPT would be necessary. I wouldn&#8217;t have thought summoning the very people who CONSTANTLY bash liberals and Democrats but can&#8217;t bring themselves to have a conversation on how little difference there has been between Republicans and conservatives of late on fiscal and social policies.</p>
<p>    TownHall, Washington Times and WorldNetDaily on a regular basis, bash liberals.<br />
 But ALSO bash homosexuals, in particular. Not a week goes by when TH finds some extreme leap of nonsense in which to connect gay people.</p>
<p>    Perhaps the wildfires in Australia as an act of a sexually frustrated gay arsonist will be next?<br />
Any bets?</p>
<p>   If we blamed ALL heterosexuals or made them responsible for his actions, then they&#8217;d protest at the unfairness of doing so, and assert that they don&#8217;t CONDONE the actions of this person.</p>
<p>  However, few of them can even NAME a person or something from someone gay that went to such violent extremes connected DIRECTLY to political beliefs by prominent gay media or gay people themselves.</p>
<p>  As it happens, they continue to assume ALL gay people are to be held accountable not only for singular and anecdotal acts by gay people that may or may not negatively impact a straight person, but gay people are also held accountable for NOT supporting polygamy and incest and so on, but they firmly believe gay people condone pedophilia.</p>
<p>   I&#8217;m not sure if I&#8217;m making sense here.<br />
Perhaps it&#8217;s because it&#8217;s so hard not to tear out your hair at how idiotic it all is, as well as dangerous.</p>
<p>    In that shooting was a spectacular act of heroism. One of the members of the church put himself between the shooter and other potential victims, giving them time to get to cover.</p>
<p>    We mentioned it in the gay media an on blogs, but the conservative media did not.</p>
<p>    Figures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason D</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/02/14/8811/comment-page-1#comment-33463</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 19:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=8811#comment-33463</guid>
		<description>Oh, so Ann Coulter finally decided to put her words into action, but what an unattractive disguise.

Oh, that&#039;s not Ann Coulter?  I could&#039;ve sworn by the writing....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, so Ann Coulter finally decided to put her words into action, but what an unattractive disguise.</p>
<p>Oh, that&#8217;s not Ann Coulter?  I could&#8217;ve sworn by the writing&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/02/14/8811/comment-page-1#comment-33460</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=8811#comment-33460</guid>
		<description>Why does it seem they always have trouble spelling words correctly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does it seem they always have trouble spelling words correctly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
