I’ve found that the reason people don’t offer citations is because they don’t have any.

And anyway, bigotted uninformed parents will not see a difference between “being the cause of” their child’s [filthy sinful awful] homosexuality and “being the ones to blame for” their child’s [filthy awful sinful] homosexuality.

The reason why I am not making citations (which I don’t see you offering either) is because my main point wasn’t about the causation of homosexuality, just the oddness of equating a particular opinion on that subject with the idea that homosexuals are responsible for the Holocaust.

This is what I mean by “abuse that is not remembered.”

I really don’t know what you mean about sexual abuse that people can’t remember. As for other kinds of parental behaviour being responsible for homosexuality – yes, that might well be partly true (in the opinion of various respected researchers, Kenneth Zucker, Seymour Fisher, among others).

My main point, however, was theories like this are in no way the equivalent of the various other statements (about the Holocaust, etc) at the Uganda conference. It shows a lack of a sense of proportion to suggest that they are.

Because of them I am gay. Since I inherited their genes and DNA, which is what caused me to be born gay. As well as with brown skin, brown eyes and black hair!

I am PROUD to have inherited all of these traits and I am thankful to my parents for having passed them on to me.

That theory might be partly true

Which part, exactly? The part about the over-bearing mother and absent father, or the part about sexual abuse that gays just can’t seem to remember at all? (must be the trauma of being gay that represses it.)

The so-called “environmental” factors of homosexual orientation have already been put under study, and “environmental” doesn’t automatically mean “nurture-induced.”

It’s all about the money, and that’s about as unChristian as Exodus can get.