<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Uganda Activist Cites Disbarred &#8220;Therapist&#8221; As Authority on Homosexuality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/03/31/10263/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/03/31/10263</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:19:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Strange, True &#38; Religious : Conference in Uganda by 3 professional anti-gays from U.S. sets off strange feeding frenzy with pastors accusing rivals of gayness, miracle faking and human sacrifices</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/03/31/10263/comment-page-1#comment-40679</link>
		<dc:creator>Strange, True &#38; Religious : Conference in Uganda by 3 professional anti-gays from U.S. sets off strange feeding frenzy with pastors accusing rivals of gayness, miracle faking and human sacrifices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 22:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=10263#comment-40679</guid>
		<description>[...] Mar 31: Uganda Activist Cites Disbarred “Therapist” As Authority on Homosexuality [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mar 31: Uganda Activist Cites Disbarred “Therapist” As Authority on Homosexuality [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quo III</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/03/31/10263/comment-page-1#comment-37372</link>
		<dc:creator>quo III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=10263#comment-37372</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s wrong, by the way, to say that anti-gay activists pick on these studies because they are the easiest to disprove - one can &quot;disprove&quot; anything whatever to one&#039;s own satisfaction if one dislikes it strongly enough. It simply happens that these are the three best known studies, all done by people who have a public profile and have written popular books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s wrong, by the way, to say that anti-gay activists pick on these studies because they are the easiest to disprove &#8211; one can &#8220;disprove&#8221; anything whatever to one&#8217;s own satisfaction if one dislikes it strongly enough. It simply happens that these are the three best known studies, all done by people who have a public profile and have written popular books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quo III</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/03/31/10263/comment-page-1#comment-37370</link>
		<dc:creator>quo III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=10263#comment-37370</guid>
		<description>&#039;Instead, they only pick on the three weakest and easiest to disprove studies.&#039;

I assume that what you mean by this is that these studies don&#039;t show conclusively that homosexuality has biological causes. This is true - but it&#039;s one say that, and something else to say that that the studies themselves have been disproven. The results of the studies may still be valid even if those results don&#039;t show that homosexuality is inborn.

Regarding LeVay&#039;s work, there&#039;s an article here that is partly about how his study is viewed in the light of subsequent scientific research:

http://www.simonlevay.com/my-response-to-my-wikipedia-biography</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Instead, they only pick on the three weakest and easiest to disprove studies.&#8217;</p>
<p>I assume that what you mean by this is that these studies don&#8217;t show conclusively that homosexuality has biological causes. This is true &#8211; but it&#8217;s one say that, and something else to say that that the studies themselves have been disproven. The results of the studies may still be valid even if those results don&#8217;t show that homosexuality is inborn.</p>
<p>Regarding LeVay&#8217;s work, there&#8217;s an article here that is partly about how his study is viewed in the light of subsequent scientific research:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.simonlevay.com/my-response-to-my-wikipedia-biography" rel="nofollow">http://www.simonlevay.com/my-response-to-my-wikipedia-biography</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emproph</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/03/31/10263/comment-page-1#comment-37363</link>
		<dc:creator>Emproph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=10263#comment-37363</guid>
		<description>Jim, here’s one from the New York Times if you haven’t found it yet:

&lt;I&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/11/health/11real.html?_r=1&amp;ref=science&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;“The Claim: Identical Twins Have Identical DNA&lt;/a&gt;
Published: March 11, 2008

…THE BOTTOM LINE 
Identical twins apparently do not have identical DNA.”&lt;/I&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, here’s one from the New York Times if you haven’t found it yet:</p>
<p><i><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/11/health/11real.html?_r=1&amp;ref=science" rel="nofollow">“The Claim: Identical Twins Have Identical DNA</a><br />
Published: March 11, 2008</p>
<p>…THE BOTTOM LINE<br />
Identical twins apparently do not have identical DNA.”</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Burroway</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/03/31/10263/comment-page-1#comment-37362</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Burroway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=10263#comment-37362</guid>
		<description>We are looking into a long-term project to collect the hundreds of studies and present them on BTB. It&#039;s a very daunting task, and its posting is still many months away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are looking into a long-term project to collect the hundreds of studies and present them on BTB. It&#8217;s a very daunting task, and its posting is still many months away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ephilei</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/03/31/10263/comment-page-1#comment-37360</link>
		<dc:creator>Ephilei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=10263#comment-37360</guid>
		<description>&quot;In America, what was the civil rights movement? People are being discriminated against because they are Black.&quot;

Ah . . . No.

I thought the Bailey twin study was pretty darn strong. What&#039;s stronger?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In America, what was the civil rights movement? People are being discriminated against because they are Black.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah . . . No.</p>
<p>I thought the Bailey twin study was pretty darn strong. What&#8217;s stronger?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard W. Fitch</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/03/31/10263/comment-page-1#comment-37359</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard W. Fitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=10263#comment-37359</guid>
		<description>&quot;If that thing is something you have no choice about and something inborn, then it is a civil rights issue. ....  But issues of choice, if I choose to be a thief, if I choose to be a murderer, I cannot stand up and say, “Oh, you see, I was born this way.” No.&quot;  
... So if I choose to be a Democratic or an Episcopalian or a human rights activist, that is not a civil rights issue; it is something I have control over and can change....just like choosing to live the &#039;homosexual lifestyle&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If that thing is something you have no choice about and something inborn, then it is a civil rights issue. &#8230;.  But issues of choice, if I choose to be a thief, if I choose to be a murderer, I cannot stand up and say, “Oh, you see, I was born this way.” No.&#8221;<br />
&#8230; So if I choose to be a Democratic or an Episcopalian or a human rights activist, that is not a civil rights issue; it is something I have control over and can change&#8230;.just like choosing to live the &#8216;homosexual lifestyle&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
