<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trouble in New Hampshire &#8211; Amendments Voted Down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/05/20/11516/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/05/20/11516</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJD</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/05/20/11516/comment-page-1#comment-41054</link>
		<dc:creator>AJD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=11516#comment-41054</guid>
		<description>I just read that the NOM is trying to capitalize on Steve Vaillancourt&#039;s vote against the bill. Thanks for empowering our enemies, Steve!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read that the NOM is trying to capitalize on Steve Vaillancourt&#8217;s vote against the bill. Thanks for empowering our enemies, Steve!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burr</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/05/20/11516/comment-page-1#comment-41044</link>
		<dc:creator>Burr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 02:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=11516#comment-41044</guid>
		<description>This is so shortsighted. I can sort of understand the principle this vote stands for, but it serves the purposes of the bigots to make us look unreasonable.

If this expanded language to &quot;protect discrimination&quot; so to speak causes problems later on, we can tackle it then. Much like the continued inequity of civil unions only served to strengthen the case for marriage.

Don&#039;t let perfect be the enemy of great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so shortsighted. I can sort of understand the principle this vote stands for, but it serves the purposes of the bigots to make us look unreasonable.</p>
<p>If this expanded language to &#8220;protect discrimination&#8221; so to speak causes problems later on, we can tackle it then. Much like the continued inequity of civil unions only served to strengthen the case for marriage.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t let perfect be the enemy of great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Houndentenor</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/05/20/11516/comment-page-1#comment-41042</link>
		<dc:creator>Houndentenor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 00:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=11516#comment-41042</guid>
		<description>Oy vey.  Let them have language protecting religion.  It&#039;s not necessary.  Churches (and other religious organizations) can already refuse to marry people (for example, those of different faiths), but if this placates someone, what do we care?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oy vey.  Let them have language protecting religion.  It&#8217;s not necessary.  Churches (and other religious organizations) can already refuse to marry people (for example, those of different faiths), but if this placates someone, what do we care?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJD</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/05/20/11516/comment-page-1#comment-41041</link>
		<dc:creator>AJD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 00:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=11516#comment-41041</guid>
		<description>Leave it to the Log Cabin types to screw everything up for the community. Between Andrew Sullivan constantly attacking hate crime legislation and this, who needs homophobes with homosexuals like this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leave it to the Log Cabin types to screw everything up for the community. Between Andrew Sullivan constantly attacking hate crime legislation and this, who needs homophobes with homosexuals like this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/05/20/11516/comment-page-1#comment-41040</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 00:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=11516#comment-41040</guid>
		<description>So... now what happens?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; now what happens?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruno</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/05/20/11516/comment-page-1#comment-41039</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 00:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=11516#comment-41039</guid>
		<description>Lynch 1, Vaillancourt 1, NH LGBT folk 0

Both say they want the marriage equality bill to go through, but now both are bandying the language of it between each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lynch 1, Vaillancourt 1, NH LGBT folk 0</p>
<p>Both say they want the marriage equality bill to go through, but now both are bandying the language of it between each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/05/20/11516/comment-page-1#comment-41037</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 23:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=11516#comment-41037</guid>
		<description>In otherwords this gay Republican twit sabotaged marriage equality over some bogus separation of powers minutiae.  If this were over some unimportant issue like the budget I&#039;d say rake the Governor over the coals.  But our rights are more important than your little political whizzing contest.

Tomorrow the hysterical Right will just be screeching &quot;SEE!? They really do want to FORCE religious institutions to perform homosexual &#039;marriages&#039;&quot;.  So good job there Log Cabin traitor, you just made a non-issue the deal breaker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In otherwords this gay Republican twit sabotaged marriage equality over some bogus separation of powers minutiae.  If this were over some unimportant issue like the budget I&#8217;d say rake the Governor over the coals.  But our rights are more important than your little political whizzing contest.</p>
<p>Tomorrow the hysterical Right will just be screeching &#8220;SEE!? They really do want to FORCE religious institutions to perform homosexual &#8216;marriages&#8217;&#8221;.  So good job there Log Cabin traitor, you just made a non-issue the deal breaker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
