Comments on: Maggie Gallagher’s Bogus Poll

By: jim

jim — Tue, 26 May 2009 00:11:49 +0000

Thank you Box Turtle Bulletin for helping keep the FACTS correct.

I never realized that people on the religious right would LIE!

The religious people I know are honorable, trustworthy and just good people.

I don’t understand the people that are so anti-gay. They seem so full of hate.

I ask WHY? WHY do you hate me because I’m not like you? I do make a great potato salad. What’s the problem? Do I need an “e” on the end?

By: Richard W. Fitch

Richard W. Fitch — Mon, 25 May 2009 23:40:08 +0000

Oh!! My!! Emily!! You gone and done it again —- ROFLMAO

By: Emily K

Emily K — Mon, 25 May 2009 22:23:42 +0000

Maddie Shmagegliggher, the head of NOME, just released a poll of her own.

By: Pender

Pender — Mon, 25 May 2009 22:21:46 +0000

Every time I think I’ve seen it all from the anti-gay Right, Maggie manages to up the ante. I can’t believe that woman can still make me angry, but she somehow manages it.

By: PantherFarber

PantherFarber — Mon, 25 May 2009 13:48:15 +0000

to a. mcewen

no it should be called “The Ghastly Gallagher Award”. i for one am getting sick of people caring about how others are going to spin it. if enough of us are calling the bigots what they are. . . bigots, then others will catch on and hopefully they will go the way of Paul Cameron and only be referenced by Wing Nut Daily.

By: cd

cd — Mon, 25 May 2009 02:26:20 +0000

As one of them Evil Librul Bay State residents who helped foist this evil upon the United States: proper pollings show about 60% support for gay marriage, if not slightly more.

By: Grant

Grant — Sun, 24 May 2009 18:58:51 +0000

Great post.

For future reference, the commonly-accepted term for a resident of Massachusetts is “Bay Stater.” It’s easier to type and say. :)

By: KZ

KZ — Sun, 24 May 2009 02:39:41 +0000

Nice, David C. How about ‘the NOM award?’ As in The Nutty Ol’ Maggie Award.

By: David C.

David C. — Sat, 23 May 2009 20:27:54 +0000

NOM: Nutty Old Maggie.

By: scotte

scotte — Sat, 23 May 2009 17:56:32 +0000

While Gallagher will undoubtedly spin the heck out of these results I find them quite encouraging. Using a skewed sample as representative, biasing the heck out of the questions, and asking the questions in an order designed to elicit as negative responses as possible she still can’t get better than a one percent plurality on her side? Go Massachusetts!