<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Ensign Affair</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/06/16/12181/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/06/16/12181</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 16:31:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/06/16/12181/comment-page-1#comment-93563</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 22:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=12181#comment-93563</guid>
		<description>With a wife that beautiful he should claim temporary insanity!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a wife that beautiful he should claim temporary insanity!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/06/16/12181/comment-page-1#comment-42835</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=12181#comment-42835</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t Adultery a much greater sin than being gay?  Apparently not to right wing Republicans, I guess, since they are almost universally guilty of it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t Adultery a much greater sin than being gay?  Apparently not to right wing Republicans, I guess, since they are almost universally guilty of it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/06/16/12181/comment-page-1#comment-42808</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=12181#comment-42808</guid>
		<description>I love it.  An adulterer teaching us about the sanctity of marriage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it.  An adulterer teaching us about the sanctity of marriage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveA</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/06/16/12181/comment-page-1#comment-42790</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=12181#comment-42790</guid>
		<description>I know this is a non sequitur...but he is kind of hot! I have always had a thing for older, daddy types.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is a non sequitur&#8230;but he is kind of hot! I have always had a thing for older, daddy types.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/06/16/12181/comment-page-1#comment-42773</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=12181#comment-42773</guid>
		<description>Sanctity of marriage indeed! 

He should absolutely resign- the hypocrite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sanctity of marriage indeed! </p>
<p>He should absolutely resign- the hypocrite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/06/16/12181/comment-page-1#comment-42761</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=12181#comment-42761</guid>
		<description>I am beginning to wonder if any of the supoorters of the Defense of Marriage Act and the Federal Marriage Amendment have been faithful to their spouse.  Perhaps support for these sorts of things in a marker for being a cheating spouse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am beginning to wonder if any of the supoorters of the Defense of Marriage Act and the Federal Marriage Amendment have been faithful to their spouse.  Perhaps support for these sorts of things in a marker for being a cheating spouse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
