Box Turtle Bulletin

Box Turtle BulletinNews, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric
“Now you must raise your children up in a world where that union of man and box turtle is on the same legal footing as man and wife…”
This article can be found at:
Latest Posts

Reality Check

Jim Burroway

June 26th, 2009

Are the LGBT blogosphere’s opinions of President Barack Obama in line with those of the average LGBT man and woman on the street?

In two dozen interviews on the street in Manhattan and Brooklyn, gay, lesbian, and transgendered New Yorkers generally first discussed the economy, healthcare, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and issues that are not specific to the queer community when asked to evaluate Obama.

While they expected action on gay issues, most were willing to wait until later in Obama’s term for results, and only two saw such issues as their primary concern. For some, if they had to choose, they might not select a gay choice.

“As an HIV-positive gay man, I would rather have healthcare than gay marriage,” said Manny Rodriguez, 42, as he stood outside the office of Make the Road New York in Brooklyn’s Bushwick neighborhood.

That contrasts with angry criticism on a few gay blogs over the past month. The bloggers have pilloried the White House for what they view as its inaction on repealing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, the Defense of Marriage Act, and enacting a federal law that would ban discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. While the blogs represent a segment of the community, it is not clear how large that segment is. It is equally unclear that the agenda the blogs are pressing on the White House is one the broader community would choose.

This is by no means a scientific survey, but then neither would a survey of blog readers and writers. What do you think?

Comments

POST COMMENT | COMMENT RSS 2.0 | TRACKBACK URL

Ben in Oakland
June 26th, 2009 | LINK

I tihnk bloggers are probably more active, more aware of what’s going on, and thinking aobut it more.

Ken in Riverside
June 26th, 2009 | LINK

That gay and lesbian people wouldn’t identify gay issues as the most important issues that Obama is dealing with isn’t a very interesting observation. Most gays I know don’t consider their sexuality to be the primary defining source of identity.

I read your blog along with The Daily Dish as my primary sources for gay-rights issues. So, while recognizing the potential selection bias, I have to say that I am very, very unpleased with Obama’s performance on gay issues. I don’t think I can put it better than Sullivan when he says that Obama just wants us to go away. What evidence do we have to the contrary? Symbolic gestures like hand-written notes to DADT discharges and a speech here or there when DNC fundraisers lose contributions from gay orgs. Which is the real policy? The one submitted to the SCOTUS or the one to which lip service is given at fund raisers?

I’d be fine with the achievements being made later in his term. President Obama’s campeign co-opted “hope”. It was an inspiring and uplifting message. Where is our hope? We HOPE to have equal rights one day. We HOPE that our spouses won’t be deported. We HOPE that whatever hospital closest to us honors our rights as spouses. We HOPE that our professional lives and skills would be valued on their own merits, independant of which sex we are attracted to.

Perhaps President Obama doesn’t want to diminish our hopefulness by doing so little as engaging our community before damaging our interests with something as trivial as a SCOTUS brief.

Next time, I’m voting for the candidate that runs on the “Certainty” platform.

Bruce Garrett
June 26th, 2009 | LINK

That link isn’t working. I’d like to see the source. If it’s from a mainstream news outlet then I wouldn’t be at all surprised to see them trying to marginalize the bloggers. There’s not a whole lot of love lost there…

Burr
June 26th, 2009 | LINK

“It is equally unclear that the agenda the blogs are pressing on the White House is one the broader community would choose.”

What nonsense. There’s nothing to choose. Equal rights are a demand of our very existence. The community is not split on what they would CHOOSE to happen. They may be split on their level of patience, however.

Cooner
June 26th, 2009 | LINK

What do I think?

I think it’s not too surprising. Like Ben said above, bloggers are more aware than the typical man-on-the-street. And like Ken said, few people consider their sexuality the most important aspect of their life, especially when bigger problems are pressing.

I think it’s reasonable to assume some priorities, that some broad challenges we’re facing must take precedence over others.

At the same time, though, the squeaky wheel gets the grease. While there’s some threat of seeming selfish or greedy, and while some people do go too far in harsh criticism, I think we have a right to keep reminding the government that these are real issues that we want, nay, need to see progress on soon.

Yeah, fixing the economy is probably a lot more important than repealing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. But repealing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell would also be a lot easier. They could probably get it done on their lunch break, figuratively speaking.

Hunter
June 26th, 2009 | LINK

I’m also getting a broken link. There’s not enough information in the quoted portion to evaluate the survey — what actual choices were the respondents given, and in what context were gay rights presented as part of the overall picture?

As for the blogs not reflecting the average LGBT, what media outlet does reflect the average anyone? CNN? New York Times? Fox? Excuse me, but is there a slight conceptual gap here? And, to be perfectly honest, I do see the role of political blogs as adversarial, at least in part — it’s some thing that’s been missing in this country for a while.

Based on the segment in this post, I don’t see much of value in the survey — which is probably why it got reported.

Lynn David
June 26th, 2009 | LINK

It would have been peachy-keen if the democrats had gotten their act together and passed just one initiative. And I think that one should have been ENDA or rather, GENDA. That would have been what I think should have been done.

But I’m with the guy on the NY street [at whatever link that is supposed to be], I’d much rather have some sort of effective health care passed. I got purposefully price out of my health-care insurance by the company I was with, and cannot get new insurance because of certain pre-existing conditions. I’ve spent into the mid-6 figures the last serveral years on healthcare which has destroyed a life savings.

DOMA and DADT could have been left until later. I suspect that Obama would rather institute new rules into the military after bring home most of the troops anyway. DOMA could wait until 2010 or later.

NH Baritone
June 27th, 2009 | LINK

I have been extremely disappointed by the President’s failure to follow through on his pro-gay campaign rhetoric.

Inviting a few gay folks in for tea and cookies does NOT come close to fulfillment of his pre-election promises, and neither does giving minimal rights to gay couples who work for the Feds. Even Condi Rice did that.

He should immediately through his stop-loss executive power suspend the implementation of “don’t ask-don’t tell.” (This will provide a period of experiment for the military to live with openly gay people among its ranks.) He should put all of his weight behind ENDA. And he should insist that congress begin repeal of DOMA within its current session.

Ed White, Knoxville
June 28th, 2009 | LINK

I think it’s not just a matter of LGBT bloggers being more informed – they’re IMMERSED, thoroughly, in LGBT news, with the intent on creating or at least perpetuating more of it. The weaker journalistic types lean toward the dramatic to generate more buzz – it’s addictive and gets noticed. But even the more ethical, thoughtful bloggers aren’t immune from the echo-chamber effect of the blogsphere. The buzz of the day or the week bounces around and gets amplified sometimes to the point that it doesn’t really match the reality on the ground.

I’m not a blogger, but I’m not immune either. In preparation for a speech at our local PrideFest, I read everything I could find on the web for weeks, trying to decide where my audience might be at. In the earlier days, a couple of weeks ago, I found the near rage I was reading appalling. By the time I finished writing my speech 2 days ago, I had gotten caught up in it somewhat myself, and tried to play the middle, recognize the anger and try to mitigate it.

But from the reaction, during and after my speech, I now feel it was a bit of a wrong note the way I recognized this anger as if it were somehow commonplace: I couldn’t really find that much anger in the audience, and in fact, the cheers I got were from counseling patience.

Granted, Knoxville’s LGBTs have always been more moderate – even conservative – than the rest of the country in general, but I have a feeling the rest of the country is far more patient that the blogsphere and many immersed activists, too.

Michael Ditto
June 29th, 2009 | LINK

I think we and the President can multitask.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.