<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Times of India: Delhi Court Ruling Legalizing Homosexuality Binding Nationwide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/07/03/12858/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/07/03/12858</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 02:47:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Police in India Raid Gay Party &#38; Detain 133 For &#8216;Indecent Behavior&#8217; &#124; Back2Stonewall</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/07/03/12858/comment-page-1#comment-106612</link>
		<dc:creator>Police in India Raid Gay Party &#38; Detain 133 For &#8216;Indecent Behavior&#8217; &#124; Back2Stonewall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=12858#comment-106612</guid>
		<description>[...] would seem that the police in Bombay/Mumbai did not get the memo that back in 2009 the Delhi High Court decriminalized homosexual intercourse between consenting adults, throughout India. It would seem that the bigotry [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] would seem that the police in Bombay/Mumbai did not get the memo that back in 2009 the Delhi High Court decriminalized homosexual intercourse between consenting adults, throughout India. It would seem that the bigotry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mombian &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weekly Political Roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/07/03/12858/comment-page-1#comment-44565</link>
		<dc:creator>Mombian &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weekly Political Roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=12858#comment-44565</guid>
		<description>[...] Times of India said the Delhi High Court ruling that struck down the criminalization of homosexuality is binding [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Times of India said the Delhi High Court ruling that struck down the criminalization of homosexuality is binding [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Zamen</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/07/03/12858/comment-page-1#comment-44419</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Zamen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=12858#comment-44419</guid>
		<description>This court ruling is assuredly a step in the right direction, though obviously opposition remains and an appeal may very well yet occur. Whether it does or not, intolerance of homosexuality remains virulent both in the U.S and abroad. That is the salient point of my recently released biographical novel, Broken Saint. It is based on my forty-year friendship with a gay man, and chronicles his internal and external struggles as he battles for acceptance (of himself and by others). More information on the book is available at www.eloquentbooks.com/BrokenSaint.html.

Mark Zamen, author</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This court ruling is assuredly a step in the right direction, though obviously opposition remains and an appeal may very well yet occur. Whether it does or not, intolerance of homosexuality remains virulent both in the U.S and abroad. That is the salient point of my recently released biographical novel, Broken Saint. It is based on my forty-year friendship with a gay man, and chronicles his internal and external struggles as he battles for acceptance (of himself and by others). More information on the book is available at <a href="http://www.eloquentbooks.com/BrokenSaint.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.eloquentbooks.com/BrokenSaint.html</a>.</p>
<p>Mark Zamen, author</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/07/03/12858/comment-page-1#comment-44173</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=12858#comment-44173</guid>
		<description>KipEsquire

I have no idea what you are talking about.  Who called out whom about what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KipEsquire</p>
<p>I have no idea what you are talking about.  Who called out whom about what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KipEsquire</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/07/03/12858/comment-page-1#comment-44051</link>
		<dc:creator>KipEsquire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 13:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=12858#comment-44051</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Although legal pundits are divided on this, the law laid down by a 2004 SC judgment implies that homosexuals across the country may rest assured that they too are entitled to the benefits of the historic Delhi high court decision on Section 377 IPC.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

divided ... implies ... may

Sorry, but those of us who got this story right and called out those of them who got this story wrong were, um, right, and those of them who got this story wrong were, um, wrong.

It&#039;s the DOMA brief all over again: people on both sides, with agendas (including trying to cover up their own sloppy reporting and blogging), negligently confusing -- or intentionally obfuscating -- the difference between law and policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Although legal pundits are divided on this, the law laid down by a 2004 SC judgment implies that homosexuals across the country may rest assured that they too are entitled to the benefits of the historic Delhi high court decision on Section 377 IPC.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>divided &#8230; implies &#8230; may</p>
<p>Sorry, but those of us who got this story right and called out those of them who got this story wrong were, um, right, and those of them who got this story wrong were, um, wrong.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the DOMA brief all over again: people on both sides, with agendas (including trying to cover up their own sloppy reporting and blogging), negligently confusing &#8212; or intentionally obfuscating &#8212; the difference between law and policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
