Comments on: Congrats, Wisconsin Couples http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/08/03/13830 News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric Sun, 26 May 2013 08:38:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: Anon http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/08/03/13830/comment-page-1#comment-47130 Anon Tue, 04 Aug 2009 12:18:46 +0000 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=13830#comment-47130 Yeah.. sure sounds like they had more than "protecting marriage" in mind when they passed that amendment. Yeah.. sure sounds like they had more than “protecting marriage” in mind when they passed that amendment.

]]> By: el polacko http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/08/03/13830/comment-page-1#comment-47126 el polacko Tue, 04 Aug 2009 06:15:52 +0000 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=13830#comment-47126 why must they 'share the same residence' ?? my married co-worker lives in california and his wife lives in nevada where she is attending school.. but they are still 'married'. just one example of why domestic partners is not equality. why must they ‘share the same residence’ ?? my married co-worker lives in california and his wife lives in nevada where she is attending school.. but they are still ‘married’.
just one example of why domestic partners is not equality.

]]> By: Burr http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/08/03/13830/comment-page-1#comment-47111 Burr Tue, 04 Aug 2009 00:12:12 +0000 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=13830#comment-47111 Once again the true colors are on display. This isn't about the definition of a word. This is about being dicks. Period. Once again the true colors are on display.

This isn’t about the definition of a word.

This is about being dicks. Period.

]]> By: Sam http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/08/03/13830/comment-page-1#comment-47110 Sam Tue, 04 Aug 2009 00:08:43 +0000 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=13830#comment-47110 I still remember when they were pushing this amendment, the Wisconsin Family Council said it wouldn't affect domestic partnerships. Now that we have them, they are trying to take it away. Back stabbing liers. I can't wait for our Supreme Court to decide whether the constitutional amendment to ban both civil unions and same-sex marriage was in fact, two questions and therefore, is unconstitutional. I hope they do strike it down. It will be a major blow to WFC. Ha. I still remember when they were pushing this amendment, the Wisconsin Family Council said it wouldn’t affect domestic partnerships. Now that we have them, they are trying to take it away. Back stabbing liers.

I can’t wait for our Supreme Court to decide whether the constitutional amendment to ban both civil unions and same-sex marriage was in fact, two questions and therefore, is unconstitutional. I hope they do strike it down. It will be a major blow to WFC. Ha.

]]> By: L. Junius Brutus http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/08/03/13830/comment-page-1#comment-47095 L. Junius Brutus Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:21:52 +0000 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=13830#comment-47095 Their love, compassion and charity is impressive. As it their ability to twist the truth. When you are trying to pass the amendment, proclaim that it's only about marriage and doesn't affect domestic partnerships. When it has been passed, argue that it bans domestic partnerships. What group other than Christian fundamentalists can get away with such outright deception and lying? Why doesn't anyone stand up to these creeps? Their love, compassion and charity is impressive.

As it their ability to twist the truth.

When you are trying to pass the amendment, proclaim that it’s only about marriage and doesn’t affect domestic partnerships. When it has been passed, argue that it bans domestic partnerships. What group other than Christian fundamentalists can get away with such outright deception and lying? Why doesn’t anyone stand up to these creeps?

]]>