<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Most Unusual Methodist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/09/01/14413/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/09/01/14413</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 20:17:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig L. Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/09/01/14413/comment-page-1#comment-49023</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig L. Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=14413#comment-49023</guid>
		<description>Oh hey! I remembered correctly. Here&#039;s a piece by conservative UM activist Mark Tooley on the Steen &amp; Phoenix cases: http://spectator.org/archives/2007/05/25/gender-benders</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh hey! I remembered correctly. Here&#8217;s a piece by conservative UM activist Mark Tooley on the Steen &amp; Phoenix cases: <a href="http://spectator.org/archives/2007/05/25/gender-benders" rel="nofollow">http://spectator.org/archives/2007/05/25/gender-benders</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig L. Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/09/01/14413/comment-page-1#comment-49022</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig L. Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=14413#comment-49022</guid>
		<description>Regan&#039;s remarks got me thinking.... Y&#039;know if he had revealed this during the process leading up to ordination... or if he&#039;d revealed this *prior* to coming to his present church... people very likely *would have tried to somehow block him, even though there is no disciplinary basis for it. There was a case several years ago of a male UM pastor who went on Leave of Absence from the ministry, and then, years later, wanted to come back into active ministry... but as a female. There was an outcry against her at that Annual Conference and, in that case, people *did find a way of blocking her! I seem to remember that her name was Rebecca Steen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regan&#8217;s remarks got me thinking&#8230;. Y&#8217;know if he had revealed this during the process leading up to ordination&#8230; or if he&#8217;d revealed this *prior* to coming to his present church&#8230; people very likely *would have tried to somehow block him, even though there is no disciplinary basis for it. There was a case several years ago of a male UM pastor who went on Leave of Absence from the ministry, and then, years later, wanted to come back into active ministry&#8230; but as a female. There was an outcry against her at that Annual Conference and, in that case, people *did find a way of blocking her! I seem to remember that her name was Rebecca Steen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regan DuCasse</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/09/01/14413/comment-page-1#comment-49016</link>
		<dc:creator>Regan DuCasse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=14413#comment-49016</guid>
		<description>This just goes to show that a person who has gone through the transition, or is in before or after mode, can be a compassionate, effective and contributing person.
  I shouldn&#039;t have to say it. No church should consider punishing someone for having that experience in their lives. Would they discriminate against anyone else for a medical issue that they had the good fortune to be able to do something about?
 Are people obligated to disclose that condition? 
If a church creates secrecy because disclosure would make that individual lose their church and community, then isn&#039;t the church in particular doing the most uncharitable and unChristian thing?
 I would think disclosure should only be a matter of individual choice and to help educate on it. And a church (or any other workplace or church group )shouldn&#039;t make it any more than that either.

    I&#039;ve asked in more conservative journals how one&#039;s gender isn&#039;t neutral when it comes to virtue, abilities, intelligence and individual talent.

 Of course, no one EVER answers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just goes to show that a person who has gone through the transition, or is in before or after mode, can be a compassionate, effective and contributing person.<br />
  I shouldn&#8217;t have to say it. No church should consider punishing someone for having that experience in their lives. Would they discriminate against anyone else for a medical issue that they had the good fortune to be able to do something about?<br />
 Are people obligated to disclose that condition?<br />
If a church creates secrecy because disclosure would make that individual lose their church and community, then isn&#8217;t the church in particular doing the most uncharitable and unChristian thing?<br />
 I would think disclosure should only be a matter of individual choice and to help educate on it. And a church (or any other workplace or church group )shouldn&#8217;t make it any more than that either.</p>
<p>    I&#8217;ve asked in more conservative journals how one&#8217;s gender isn&#8217;t neutral when it comes to virtue, abilities, intelligence and individual talent.</p>
<p> Of course, no one EVER answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/09/01/14413/comment-page-1#comment-48993</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=14413#comment-48993</guid>
		<description>Pomo,

True.  None of the mainline Christian denominations could be accurately described as &quot;conservative&quot;, but it is more so than, say the UCC or Episcopal Church.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pomo,</p>
<p>True.  None of the mainline Christian denominations could be accurately described as &#8220;conservative&#8221;, but it is more so than, say the UCC or Episcopal Church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pomo</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/09/01/14413/comment-page-1#comment-48989</link>
		<dc:creator>Pomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=14413#comment-48989</guid>
		<description>I would hardly label the UMC conservative...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would hardly label the UMC conservative&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig L. Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/09/01/14413/comment-page-1#comment-48985</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig L. Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=14413#comment-48985</guid>
		<description>There is no basis in the UM Discipline for any action against him. Of course, that hasn&#039;t stopped people in the past, but the fact that the news services have picked this up should help him. We now have 2 pastors like this who have been in the news. The other is named Drew Phoenix &amp; he&#039;s out east, and the church has taken no official action against him either. There IS a UM statement against same-gender sex. There is no official position or statement whatsoever on a case like this.

I&#039;m not defending the UMC I&#039;m just seeking to clarify. (And, I feel like I ought to post here every once in a while just to let you know that I do read your stuff &amp; appreciate your reporting.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no basis in the UM Discipline for any action against him. Of course, that hasn&#8217;t stopped people in the past, but the fact that the news services have picked this up should help him. We now have 2 pastors like this who have been in the news. The other is named Drew Phoenix &amp; he&#8217;s out east, and the church has taken no official action against him either. There IS a UM statement against same-gender sex. There is no official position or statement whatsoever on a case like this.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not defending the UMC I&#8217;m just seeking to clarify. (And, I feel like I ought to post here every once in a while just to let you know that I do read your stuff &amp; appreciate your reporting.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
