Comments on: Carrie Sued for her… um… Enhancements

By: Frank

Frank — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:46:40 +0000

Maybe we’re going about this wrong. If we paid for Maggie Gallagher to get liposuction, a gastric band, and fake tits she might be able to get a life and stop bothering us.

By: Richard W. Fitch

Richard W. Fitch — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:50:12 +0000

Brennin: I can only wonder who here is delusional. Both the Gov. of CA and the US Pres. have honored Harvey Milk for his contributions to the gay civil rights movement. On the otherhand, Ms. Prejean as the pretty face of NOM would perpetuate unjust discrimination and if allowed institute an American fundamentalist theocracy. Carrie’s place in history is as artifical as her ‘enhancements’.

By: werdna

werdna — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:40:15 +0000

@Timothy-I’m not sure it’s really accurate or honest to keep trying to tie NOM to Prejean at this point. NOM have pretty publicly distanced themselves from Prejean–they’ve already “kicked her to the curb”–so why keep suggesting they’re secret pals or that NOM is secretly using her? As wrong as NOM is, you should at least give them credit for realizing that Prejean is an unstable mess who did them no good.

If you have some concrete evidence of their continuing to work together, let us know about it, otherwise, try to stay current and ease up on the unfounded innuendo…

By: Christopher Waldrop

Christopher Waldrop — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:25:11 +0000

And what exactly is your argument, Brennin? Harvey Milk stood up for equal rights, while Prejean has been a supporter of prejudice, in spite of being frequently incoherent. It appears the only reason NOM keeps using her is because she’s the best she’s got–which says a lot about the organization.

By: Brennin

Brennin — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:39:24 +0000

“Someone needs to tell Carrie, ‘Girl, you’re being used. When they no longer have a use for a blond bimbo victim of the evil gays, they will kick you to the curb and you will have no one at all to turn to.’”

Polish your crystal ball, Kincaid, ‘cuz it ain’t workin.’ (Although, I expect this sort of thing from a guy who is so mired in delusion, that he thinks the oxygen-depleting parasite Harvey Milk was a hero.)

By: Regan DuCasse

Regan DuCasse — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:05:27 +0000

Yep, she got into bed with a sleazy political campaign. If she has handlers, and it would seem she does, nobody is a winner here, are they?

It goes like this: the more an organization or individual gives over to trying to slam gay people for every little thing, it’s ugly and a career built on gay bashing is one built on quicksand.

The anti gay have less and less pretty, youthful spokesfaces. They especially don’t have celebrity appeal for equality like we do.
Maggie G, Brian Brown, of NOM…Peter LaB and Matt Barber and even Harry Jackson (who reminds me of Barber in blackface), are becoming more and more unattractive specifically because of how much time and money they are spending on such a small target.

Aren’t they also the ones that think homosexuals are an insignificantly miniscule minority?

So why press conferences and engaging Miss CA….for political action taking place in MAINE?

You all are right. She’s not going to be of much use to them, eventually.
NOM is going to have to answer to a lot, when it’s all said and done.
Betcha they’ll try very hard not to…

By: Johnson

Johnson — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:39:59 +0000

Carrie should have known better than to join ranks with the likes of Maggie Gallagher. When she is no longer useful to Maggie and NOM, she is finished. Gallagher cares about one thing and one thing only–the Six Figure annual (42% of all donations NOM rakes in)salary that she pays herself.

By: David C.

David C. — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:54:17 +0000

No title, not career, and a rocky future awaits this foolish young woman. She is getting what she bargained for, unfortunately she was not smart enough to recognize that fact when she started down this path. Sad, but I won’t be shedding a tear for her as she learns a very hard lesson about prejudice and its purveyors.

By: Burr

Burr — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:42:10 +0000

No that’d be silly and a little too schadenfreude and picking on a specific person, who oddly people still sympathize with (mostly because they don’t know the whole story). She has nothing to do with the Yes on 1 campaign or Maine..

By: AdrianT

AdrianT — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:34:21 +0000

If No On 1 Maine want to take a lead on any issue, they may do well to pick this.