A really disturbing point that was made during the interview that I think should be furthe pursued, given what is going on in Uganda and the apparently free hand that Sen. Inhofe seems to be getting on the issue is the Family history in Somalia.

Apparently, the Family was a big supporter of Siad Barre’s disasterous rule in Somalia that led to the current chaos in that country that is now a terrorist haven, with starving people populating a failed state with pirates hijacking ships every time you turn around. According to the interview, The Family sheds no tears for Somalia, doesn’t care about the people inside or outside of Somalia that have been hurt so badly by the chaos and say that the current hellacious situation is “God’s Will.”

Their foreign policy track record hasn’t enhanced America’s security, and they do not seem to care. I think that America needs to take African foreign policy back from these guys and put America’s interests above the interests of Sen. Inhofe and The Family.

If so, then if the Family somehow is supportive of Bahati does that make Exodus was complicit in writing a law which was later forced into denouncing?

And I remember reading that Vereide and others back in the early days were Nazi sympathizers. And since Schmierer believes Scott Lively’s revisionist tale, doesn’t that make for some strange bedfellows?