<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 9th Circuit to Olson/Boies: No access to Prop 8 internal docs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/12/14/18030/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/12/14/18030</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:58:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hazemyth</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/12/14/18030/comment-page-1#comment-57047</link>
		<dc:creator>hazemyth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=18030#comment-57047</guid>
		<description>Interesting legal analysis of the ruling &lt;a href=&quot;http://volokh.com/2009/12/13/ninth-circuit-panel-rejects-attempt-to-discover-internal-prop-8-campaign-documents/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting legal analysis of the ruling <a href="http://volokh.com/2009/12/13/ninth-circuit-panel-rejects-attempt-to-discover-internal-prop-8-campaign-documents/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burr</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/12/14/18030/comment-page-1#comment-56992</link>
		<dc:creator>Burr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=18030#comment-56992</guid>
		<description>http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/144561/breaking%3A_marijuana_legalization_will_be_on_california%27s_2010_ballot/

Sort of off topic, but does this bode well for the tenners?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/144561/breaking%3A_marijuana_legalization_will_be_on_california%27s_2010_ballot/" rel="nofollow">http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/144561/breaking%3A_marijuana_legalization_will_be_on_california%27s_2010_ballot/</a></p>
<p>Sort of off topic, but does this bode well for the tenners?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJD</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/12/14/18030/comment-page-1#comment-56991</link>
		<dc:creator>AJD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=18030#comment-56991</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get why they should be allowed to hide all of that. I mean, it&#039;s a political campaign to make a law. It should all be public record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get why they should be allowed to hide all of that. I mean, it&#8217;s a political campaign to make a law. It should all be public record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
