<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Maine lesson: think before you go represent me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/01/18/19639/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/01/18/19639</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:04:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burr</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/01/18/19639/comment-page-2#comment-60459</link>
		<dc:creator>Burr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=19639#comment-60459</guid>
		<description>You know what, I think you&#039;re ultimately right, klaus.

And really, I don&#039;t have a problem with leather events on their own and can understand the value they have as you explain. I just get anxious when it mixes with other causes, but in the end we all have to get over it.

Besides, the more tolerance shown to the BDSM community in the general, the easier it becomes to criticize those who truly do cross the line and maintain integrity instead of allowing them to hide behind claims of intolerance and a sort of defensive tribalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what, I think you&#8217;re ultimately right, klaus.</p>
<p>And really, I don&#8217;t have a problem with leather events on their own and can understand the value they have as you explain. I just get anxious when it mixes with other causes, but in the end we all have to get over it.</p>
<p>Besides, the more tolerance shown to the BDSM community in the general, the easier it becomes to criticize those who truly do cross the line and maintain integrity instead of allowing them to hide behind claims of intolerance and a sort of defensive tribalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priya Lynn</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/01/18/19639/comment-page-2#comment-60456</link>
		<dc:creator>Priya Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=19639#comment-60456</guid>
		<description>And Grantdale, if you&#039;re going to whine about people being offensive it takes away from your credibility when you accuse others of having thick skulls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Grantdale, if you&#8217;re going to whine about people being offensive it takes away from your credibility when you accuse others of having thick skulls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priya Lynn</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/01/18/19639/comment-page-2#comment-60453</link>
		<dc:creator>Priya Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=19639#comment-60453</guid>
		<description>Grantdale, you make a dumb comment and somone might call it dumb - get over it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grantdale, you make a dumb comment and somone might call it dumb &#8211; get over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason D</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/01/18/19639/comment-page-2#comment-60450</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=19639#comment-60450</guid>
		<description>&quot;Jason D, cool it. Really.

I honestly cannot see what you are trying to defend here Jason. If you think Timothy was rude and stereotyped people, or you — just say so.&quot;

Grantdale, do you really not see it?  Really?  You read that and didn&#039;t see an obvious, textbook bigot example of connecting the dots between unrelated groups in order to attack the lot of them?

I&#039;m standing up for the BDSM folks who are plainly being pulled through the ringer.

I don&#039;t look at BDSM people and think they&#039;re badly representing me.

You know what I do when I think I&#039;m being misrepresented?

I act.

I don&#039;t complain.

I don&#039;t whine.

I act.

I stand up for myself.  I don&#039;t ask others to sit down, or consider sitting down, or consider wearing a disclaimer while they stand.  Timothy is applying a double standard, and apparently very few are willing to call him on that.

Timothy has no right to ask these folks to change in order to please him.  But that&#039;s what he&#039;s doing nonetheless.
What he should do is grow a pair and represent himself.

How is his double standard any better, any different than the ones that are applied to gay people en mass by our enemies?  

And I think you are right, this is a lost cause, as apparently people give Timothy leeway they&#039;d never give to someone like Maggie Gallagher, even though they&#039;re starting to sound alike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Jason D, cool it. Really.</p>
<p>I honestly cannot see what you are trying to defend here Jason. If you think Timothy was rude and stereotyped people, or you — just say so.&#8221;</p>
<p>Grantdale, do you really not see it?  Really?  You read that and didn&#8217;t see an obvious, textbook bigot example of connecting the dots between unrelated groups in order to attack the lot of them?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m standing up for the BDSM folks who are plainly being pulled through the ringer.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t look at BDSM people and think they&#8217;re badly representing me.</p>
<p>You know what I do when I think I&#8217;m being misrepresented?</p>
<p>I act.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t complain.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t whine.</p>
<p>I act.</p>
<p>I stand up for myself.  I don&#8217;t ask others to sit down, or consider sitting down, or consider wearing a disclaimer while they stand.  Timothy is applying a double standard, and apparently very few are willing to call him on that.</p>
<p>Timothy has no right to ask these folks to change in order to please him.  But that&#8217;s what he&#8217;s doing nonetheless.<br />
What he should do is grow a pair and represent himself.</p>
<p>How is his double standard any better, any different than the ones that are applied to gay people en mass by our enemies?  </p>
<p>And I think you are right, this is a lost cause, as apparently people give Timothy leeway they&#8217;d never give to someone like Maggie Gallagher, even though they&#8217;re starting to sound alike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grantdale</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/01/18/19639/comment-page-2#comment-60447</link>
		<dc:creator>grantdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=19639#comment-60447</guid>
		<description>Timothy, yes of course. If I chiselled it into a wrecking ball I doubt even that would make a dent in such a thick skull.

But apparently offensive terms become inoffensive if a dictionary lists the commonly used offensive term. I&#039;m going to remember that: will come in mighty handy the next time I cannot bring myself to simply apologise for gross insensitivity.

This whole conversation is gay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Timothy, yes of course. If I chiselled it into a wrecking ball I doubt even that would make a dent in such a thick skull.</p>
<p>But apparently offensive terms become inoffensive if a dictionary lists the commonly used offensive term. I&#8217;m going to remember that: will come in mighty handy the next time I cannot bring myself to simply apologise for gross insensitivity.</p>
<p>This whole conversation is gay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priya Lynn</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/01/18/19639/comment-page-2#comment-60432</link>
		<dc:creator>Priya Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=19639#comment-60432</guid>
		<description>dumb  Pronunciation [duhm]  adjective, -er, -est, verb 

–adjective &lt;b&gt;1. lacking intelligence or good judgment; stupid; dull-witted.&lt;/b&gt; 
2. lacking the power of speech (often offensive when applied to humans): a dumb animal.  
3. temporarily unable to speak: dumb with astonishment.  
4. refraining from any or much speech; silent. 
5. made, done, etc., without speech. 
6. lacking some usual property, characteristic, etc. 
7. performed in pantomime; mimed. 
8. Computers. pertaining to the inability to do processing locally: A dumb terminal can input, output, and display data, but cannot process it. Compare intelligent (def. 4).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dumb  Pronunciation [duhm]  adjective, -er, -est, verb </p>
<p>–adjective <b>1. lacking intelligence or good judgment; stupid; dull-witted.</b><br />
2. lacking the power of speech (often offensive when applied to humans): a dumb animal.<br />
3. temporarily unable to speak: dumb with astonishment.<br />
4. refraining from any or much speech; silent.<br />
5. made, done, etc., without speech.<br />
6. lacking some usual property, characteristic, etc.<br />
7. performed in pantomime; mimed.<br />
8. Computers. pertaining to the inability to do processing locally: A dumb terminal can input, output, and display data, but cannot process it. Compare intelligent (def. 4).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/01/18/19639/comment-page-2#comment-60427</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=19639#comment-60427</guid>
		<description>grantdale,

You do know that you are wasting your time, don&#039;t you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>grantdale,</p>
<p>You do know that you are wasting your time, don&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priya Lynn</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/01/18/19639/comment-page-2#comment-60425</link>
		<dc:creator>Priya Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=19639#comment-60425</guid>
		<description>Grantdale, I didn&#039;t say you or your opinions were dumb, I said your statement “I’d have more sympathy for much of what is being defended here if he’d shot someone in the head 4 days AFTER the testimony” was dumb and it most certainly was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grantdale, I didn&#8217;t say you or your opinions were dumb, I said your statement “I’d have more sympathy for much of what is being defended here if he’d shot someone in the head 4 days AFTER the testimony” was dumb and it most certainly was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grantdale</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/01/18/19639/comment-page-2#comment-60422</link>
		<dc:creator>grantdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=19639#comment-60422</guid>
		<description>Priya -- I&#039;m going to ask you one more time, politely, to stop using &#039;dumb&#039; as a synonym for &#039;stupid&#039;. Dumb is an older word for people who are non-verbal, and still in relatively common use. As in &quot;deaf and dumb&quot;.

Can you even see the hypocrisy in demanding that Timothy cease stereotyping while you are repeatedly -- and obliviously -- doing the same?

I don&#039;t care if you do call me stupid, frankly, but don&#039;t call me or my opinions &#039;dumb&#039;. That&#039;s just gay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Priya &#8212; I&#8217;m going to ask you one more time, politely, to stop using &#8216;dumb&#8217; as a synonym for &#8216;stupid&#8217;. Dumb is an older word for people who are non-verbal, and still in relatively common use. As in &#8220;deaf and dumb&#8221;.</p>
<p>Can you even see the hypocrisy in demanding that Timothy cease stereotyping while you are repeatedly &#8212; and obliviously &#8212; doing the same?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care if you do call me stupid, frankly, but don&#8217;t call me or my opinions &#8216;dumb&#8217;. That&#8217;s just gay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Rush</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/01/18/19639/comment-page-2#comment-60312</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Rush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=19639#comment-60312</guid>
		<description>As most commenters here seem to be saying, it is most unfortunate that Timothy chose to present the story of the horrific Lavallee-Davidson incident, and then go on to link it with various other traits among some gays that he finds distasteful. I agree. The Lavallee-Davidson incident is surely in a singular class by itself.

I must admit, though, that I agree with SOME of Timothy&#039;s points to SOME degree SOME of the time.

Although I am personally about as boringly vanilla as anyone can be, I&#039;m not comfortable with throwing those under the bus who don&#039;t fit the mold of being just like everyone else except for the itty-bitty detail of being gay. One year ago I wrote this as part of a comment here at BTB concerning a story about Mike Jones, the prostitute who exposed Ted Haggard:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Sometimes I think we are becoming so desperate for acceptance by straights that we are willing to abandon those on the fringes. I was thinking of this last year when many were eager to throw the transgendered under the bus in order to get ENDA passed. The T’s are certainly the most vulnerable of the LGBTs and need protection more than the rest of us. I think the people who stormed out of the Stonewall in 1969 would be disgusted with us.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Also in relation to all this, the Gay Patriot blog comes to mind where I think the writer&#039;s and most of their reader&#039;s mindset is, &quot;I don&#039;t want those damn gay liberals  to represent me. Except for the itty-bitty detail that I&#039;m unfortunately gay, I&#039;m just like Republican Christians, and I&#039;m willing kiss their asses 24/7 to prove it.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As most commenters here seem to be saying, it is most unfortunate that Timothy chose to present the story of the horrific Lavallee-Davidson incident, and then go on to link it with various other traits among some gays that he finds distasteful. I agree. The Lavallee-Davidson incident is surely in a singular class by itself.</p>
<p>I must admit, though, that I agree with SOME of Timothy&#8217;s points to SOME degree SOME of the time.</p>
<p>Although I am personally about as boringly vanilla as anyone can be, I&#8217;m not comfortable with throwing those under the bus who don&#8217;t fit the mold of being just like everyone else except for the itty-bitty detail of being gay. One year ago I wrote this as part of a comment here at BTB concerning a story about Mike Jones, the prostitute who exposed Ted Haggard:</p>
<blockquote><p>Sometimes I think we are becoming so desperate for acceptance by straights that we are willing to abandon those on the fringes. I was thinking of this last year when many were eager to throw the transgendered under the bus in order to get ENDA passed. The T’s are certainly the most vulnerable of the LGBTs and need protection more than the rest of us. I think the people who stormed out of the Stonewall in 1969 would be disgusted with us.</p></blockquote>
<p>Also in relation to all this, the Gay Patriot blog comes to mind where I think the writer&#8217;s and most of their reader&#8217;s mindset is, &#8220;I don&#8217;t want those damn gay liberals  to represent me. Except for the itty-bitty detail that I&#8217;m unfortunately gay, I&#8217;m just like Republican Christians, and I&#8217;m willing kiss their asses 24/7 to prove it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
