<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Catholic Charities Ends Spousal Benefits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/03/02/20703/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/03/02/20703</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:59:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: [links] Link salad for a rain forest Sunday &#124; jlake.com</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/03/02/20703/comment-page-1#comment-63704</link>
		<dc:creator>[links] Link salad for a rain forest Sunday &#124; jlake.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 17:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=20703#comment-63704</guid>
		<description>[...] Catholic Charities Ends Spousal Benefits &#8212; n a bid to avoid inadvertently providing spousal benefits to gay men and women who happen to be employees, Catholic Charities of Washington, D.C. , has taken the extraordinary step of ending spousal benefits for all of its employees, the Washington City Paper reports. Stay classy, conservative America. It&#8217;s what you do best, along with forcing women to remain pregnant, ruining the economy, and launching trillion dollar wars of choice. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Catholic Charities Ends Spousal Benefits &mdash; n a bid to avoid inadvertently providing spousal benefits to gay men and women who happen to be employees, Catholic Charities of Washington, D.C. , has taken the extraordinary step of ending spousal benefits for all of its employees, the Washington City Paper reports. Stay classy, conservative America. It&#8217;s what you do best, along with forcing women to remain pregnant, ruining the economy, and launching trillion dollar wars of choice. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben in Oakland</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/03/02/20703/comment-page-1#comment-63484</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben in Oakland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=20703#comment-63484</guid>
		<description>I am indeed, and a truly great one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am indeed, and a truly great one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RodW</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/03/02/20703/comment-page-1#comment-63366</link>
		<dc:creator>RodW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 05:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=20703#comment-63366</guid>
		<description>This policy change is for Catholic Charities in the DC area only. In San Francisco, they actually figured out a win-win solution years ago after the City of SF mandated that all city contractors offer equal spousal benefits. Catholic Charities SF changed their benefits policy to remove any mention of spouses, and offer benefits to another adult member of the employee&#039;s household (and their kids).  Wonder why DC couldn&#039;t do likewise and had to pull this juvenile stunt instead...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This policy change is for Catholic Charities in the DC area only. In San Francisco, they actually figured out a win-win solution years ago after the City of SF mandated that all city contractors offer equal spousal benefits. Catholic Charities SF changed their benefits policy to remove any mention of spouses, and offer benefits to another adult member of the employee&#8217;s household (and their kids).  Wonder why DC couldn&#8217;t do likewise and had to pull this juvenile stunt instead&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin K</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/03/02/20703/comment-page-1#comment-63363</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 05:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=20703#comment-63363</guid>
		<description>So when are all the gay priests going to lose their health coverage?

And does this mean the Pope has to buy his own insurance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So when are all the gay priests going to lose their health coverage?</p>
<p>And does this mean the Pope has to buy his own insurance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hulsey</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/03/02/20703/comment-page-1#comment-63355</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Hulsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 04:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=20703#comment-63355</guid>
		<description>@ Ben in Oakland: Ummm ... you are aware that HADRIAN THE SEVENTH is a work of fiction, are you not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Ben in Oakland: Ummm &#8230; you are aware that HADRIAN THE SEVENTH is a work of fiction, are you not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard W. Fitch</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/03/02/20703/comment-page-1#comment-63347</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard W. Fitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 02:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=20703#comment-63347</guid>
		<description>^^doesn&#039;t like^^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^^doesn&#8217;t like^^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard W. Fitch</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/03/02/20703/comment-page-1#comment-63345</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard W. Fitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 02:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=20703#comment-63345</guid>
		<description>Eddie89 - and in this instance, he did. The Mass was aborted........wait RCC does like that term, so computerese, it experienced an ABEND(abnormal end).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eddie89 &#8211; and in this instance, he did. The Mass was aborted&#8230;&#8230;..wait RCC does like that term, so computerese, it experienced an ABEND(abnormal end).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie89</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/03/02/20703/comment-page-1#comment-63337</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=20703#comment-63337</guid>
		<description>This news item just cross my desk.

This is not directly related to this article, but it is Catholic related.

Best quote from the article:
&lt;blockquote&gt;The man at the centre of the row has said he just wants equal treatment - if he is regarded as a sinner, he wants the priest to refuse communion to all other sinners too.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8542285.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Netherlands gay protest over Catholic communion snub&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This news item just cross my desk.</p>
<p>This is not directly related to this article, but it is Catholic related.</p>
<p>Best quote from the article:</p>
<blockquote><p>The man at the centre of the row has said he just wants equal treatment &#8211; if he is regarded as a sinner, he wants the priest to refuse communion to all other sinners too.</p></blockquote>
<p><b><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8542285.stm" rel="nofollow">Netherlands gay protest over Catholic communion snub</a></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: homer</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/03/02/20703/comment-page-1#comment-63336</link>
		<dc:creator>homer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=20703#comment-63336</guid>
		<description>And now the rest of us taxpayers get to pay the hospital bills for the spouses/partners/children of new employees. Isn&#039;t that convenient? The Catholic Church gets to save a pile of money while pretending to be martyrs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now the rest of us taxpayers get to pay the hospital bills for the spouses/partners/children of new employees. Isn&#8217;t that convenient? The Catholic Church gets to save a pile of money while pretending to be martyrs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard W. Fitch</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/03/02/20703/comment-page-1#comment-63329</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard W. Fitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=20703#comment-63329</guid>
		<description>@Jon: Well, at least those umpteenth marriages are between &#039;a man and a woman&#039;.
@Donnchadh: I believe that it is legal to continue spouse benefits under the new policy for those previously enrolled on the same basis that CA SSM were not invalidated. RE: voting rights, that played out on an entirely different field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jon: Well, at least those umpteenth marriages are between &#8216;a man and a woman&#8217;.<br />
@Donnchadh: I believe that it is legal to continue spouse benefits under the new policy for those previously enrolled on the same basis that CA SSM were not invalidated. RE: voting rights, that played out on an entirely different field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
