Comments on: NOM funds DC Candidate with questionable ethics http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/03/17/21209 News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric Sat, 18 May 2013 21:32:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: mattymatt http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/03/17/21209/comment-page-1#comment-64679 mattymatt Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:32:25 +0000 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=21209#comment-64679 Geez. It's really amazing how NOM works outside the law over and over and over and over. I hope Fred Karger can find some time to make noise about their illegal contributions in DC. Geez. It’s really amazing how NOM works outside the law over and over and over and over. I hope Fred Karger can find some time to make noise about their illegal contributions in DC.

]]> By: David C. http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/03/17/21209/comment-page-1#comment-64675 David C. Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:16:30 +0000 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=21209#comment-64675 Just remember everybody, NOM is effectively a marginally legal racketeering operation: they sell "protection" of a single kind of marriage to a group of people NOM has convinced will be threatened if the legal protections accompanying marriage were extended to same-sex couples. NOM has acted in ways that are themselves questionable and we should not be surprised that NOM would recruit others that skirt the law and undermine the system of open elections. Again, the <i>central question</i> with respect to NOM is who pays the protection money NOM depends on to maintain their racket. Just remember everybody, NOM is effectively a marginally legal racketeering operation: they sell “protection” of a single kind of marriage to a group of people NOM has convinced will be threatened if the legal protections accompanying marriage were extended to same-sex couples.

NOM has acted in ways that are themselves questionable and we should not be surprised that NOM would recruit others that skirt the law and undermine the system of open elections.

Again, the central question with respect to NOM is who pays the protection money NOM depends on to maintain their racket.

]]> By: Edwin http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/03/17/21209/comment-page-1#comment-64669 Edwin Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:40:39 +0000 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=21209#comment-64669 Sounds like a bunch of crooks getting together to see how they can screw the public with their lie's about excepting to many funds from one crooked person to another passel of crooks.They need to send a few of these crooks to prison. If most of them had to run of their own money and principles they couldn't even make good dog catchers! Sounds like a bunch of crooks getting together to see how they can screw the public with their lie’s about excepting to many funds from one crooked person to another passel of crooks.They need to send a few of these crooks to prison.
If most of them had to run of their own money and principles they couldn’t even make good dog catchers!

]]>