Comments on: Matt Barber adds names to Hate Group list

By: Richard Rush

Richard Rush — Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:26:28 +0000

John said, “I’m always reluctant to name churches in this, . . .”

Why? Churches provide virtually all the enabling fuel that allow those other groups to exist. If the churches (the enablers) all became supportive of us, the anti-gay campaigns of the other groups would collapse.

By: John

John — Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:38:43 +0000

I’m always reluctant to name churches in this, but the rest of the groups? You got it, bub.

By: penguinsaur

penguinsaur — Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:28:25 +0000

I just love how he names the Southern Baptist Convention. A group started for the sole purpose of justifying white supremacism with the bible certainly counts as a hate group. As do every other group he listed.

By: Lynn David

Lynn David — Thu, 25 Mar 2010 04:25:28 +0000

Anyone who has made his livelihood from the degradation of others by the use of falsehoods is the author of a hate group.

By: Regan DuCasse

Regan DuCasse — Thu, 25 Mar 2010 03:41:16 +0000

Tweedle dum and Tweedle dee…
Right.

By: David Malcolm

David Malcolm — Thu, 25 Mar 2010 03:03:04 +0000

My response… yup now if only we could get the other idiots to realize that :)

By: Scott P.

Scott P. — Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:55:43 +0000

Well, even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

By: Tommy

Tommy — Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:14:51 +0000

Matt Barber defending Peter LaBarbera from charges of being anti-gay is like Enron defending Fox News from charges of dishonesty.

By: Paul in Canada

Paul in Canada — Thu, 25 Mar 2010 01:49:47 +0000

Okay, I can’t resist: Matt Barber defeding Peter LaB from charges of being anti-gay is like: Hitler defending the RCC from charges of moral corruption.

By: Paul in Canada

Paul in Canada — Thu, 25 Mar 2010 01:29:27 +0000

‘He’s more unchristian than me, so there!’ LOL Oh my!