<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DADT opponents heckle Obama at CA fundraiser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/04/20/21940/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/04/20/21940</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:48:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/04/20/21940/comment-page-1#comment-67037</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=21940#comment-67037</guid>
		<description>Quo is a complete troll, stop feeding him. 

In any case, about the post: Obama is a liar, but more importantly HRC are traitors to their blood. There needs to be some campaign against them, to make people aware of what they&#039;re doing so they stop donating. 

I hope there&#039;s a special place in hell for traitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quo is a complete troll, stop feeding him. </p>
<p>In any case, about the post: Obama is a liar, but more importantly HRC are traitors to their blood. There needs to be some campaign against them, to make people aware of what they&#8217;re doing so they stop donating. </p>
<p>I hope there&#8217;s a special place in hell for traitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priya Lynn</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/04/20/21940/comment-page-1#comment-66999</link>
		<dc:creator>Priya Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=21940#comment-66999</guid>
		<description>Quo whines when people call him a troll yet his comments here serve no pupose other than to annoy people - he is nothing but a troll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quo whines when people call him a troll yet his comments here serve no pupose other than to annoy people &#8211; he is nothing but a troll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/04/20/21940/comment-page-1#comment-66994</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=21940#comment-66994</guid>
		<description>&quot;Militaries need to be intolerant.&quot;

Yes. Let&#039;s go back to the days of the all-white, all-male military. And cheer them on for killing all those dirty sand people.

You really are repulsive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Militaries need to be intolerant.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes. Let&#8217;s go back to the days of the all-white, all-male military. And cheer them on for killing all those dirty sand people.</p>
<p>You really are repulsive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quo</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/04/20/21940/comment-page-1#comment-66968</link>
		<dc:creator>Quo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=21940#comment-66968</guid>
		<description>Burr,

They&#039;ll regret the change eventually. Militaries need to be intolerant.

(I was trying to say &quot;impossible&quot; in my last post, not &quot;possible&quot; - typo trouble again).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Burr,</p>
<p>They&#8217;ll regret the change eventually. Militaries need to be intolerant.</p>
<p>(I was trying to say &#8220;impossible&#8221; in my last post, not &#8220;possible&#8221; &#8211; typo trouble again).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burr</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/04/20/21940/comment-page-1#comment-66966</link>
		<dc:creator>Burr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=21940#comment-66966</guid>
		<description>Considering over 20 other militaries have beaten us to the change that boat has long past sailed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering over 20 other militaries have beaten us to the change that boat has long past sailed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quo</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/04/20/21940/comment-page-1#comment-66965</link>
		<dc:creator>Quo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=21940#comment-66965</guid>
		<description>Edwin,

Yes, unfortunately it may be possible to keep homosexuals out of the military entirely. But, since they&#039;re a potentially disruptive element, the military should definitely do everything it can to exclude them. 

People who want to join should be asked what their sexual preference is, and if the answer is anything other than &quot;heterosexual&quot;, they should not be permitted in. I totally support the military&#039;s investigation of its soldiers&#039; private lives to weed out homosexuals.

Burr,

I&#039;m not a South African. I care what the U.S. military does because it&#039;s an important institution that affects other countries as well as the U.S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edwin,</p>
<p>Yes, unfortunately it may be possible to keep homosexuals out of the military entirely. But, since they&#8217;re a potentially disruptive element, the military should definitely do everything it can to exclude them. </p>
<p>People who want to join should be asked what their sexual preference is, and if the answer is anything other than &#8220;heterosexual&#8221;, they should not be permitted in. I totally support the military&#8217;s investigation of its soldiers&#8217; private lives to weed out homosexuals.</p>
<p>Burr,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a South African. I care what the U.S. military does because it&#8217;s an important institution that affects other countries as well as the U.S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burr</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/04/20/21940/comment-page-1#comment-66951</link>
		<dc:creator>Burr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=21940#comment-66951</guid>
		<description>Why do you even care about what the U.S. military does as a South African?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you even care about what the U.S. military does as a South African?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily K</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/04/20/21940/comment-page-1#comment-66950</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=21940#comment-66950</guid>
		<description>Go back to the baths, Quo. Think about how &quot;bad&quot; homos are while you&#039;re experiencing how &quot;good&quot; they make you feel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go back to the baths, Quo. Think about how &#8220;bad&#8221; homos are while you&#8217;re experiencing how &#8220;good&#8221; they make you feel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edwin</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/04/20/21940/comment-page-1#comment-66947</link>
		<dc:creator>Edwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 23:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=21940#comment-66947</guid>
		<description>QUO, 
   Before the DADT was put into effect there were still gays in the service.  
I know for sure cause I was one of them.
I was in in 1965 to 1968.  We are going to be there whether you straight people want us there or not.
  maybe there should be a total ban on homophobs from serving.  Then you would need some of the gays.
  The Republicans are the ones that forced the DADT into effect to start with!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QUO,<br />
   Before the DADT was put into effect there were still gays in the service.<br />
I know for sure cause I was one of them.<br />
I was in in 1965 to 1968.  We are going to be there whether you straight people want us there or not.<br />
  maybe there should be a total ban on homophobs from serving.  Then you would need some of the gays.<br />
  The Republicans are the ones that forced the DADT into effect to start with!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quo</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/04/20/21940/comment-page-1#comment-66944</link>
		<dc:creator>Quo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=21940#comment-66944</guid>
		<description>I only wish it were true that Obama, and other American Presidents, ignored your &quot;community.&quot; That way, the US military would still have the sensible policy it did before &quot;don&#039;t ask, don&#039;t tell&quot; was introduced - a complete ban on homosexuals, open or otherwise.

Unfortunately, it&#039;s likely that Obama will eventually permit homosexuals to serve openly. Too bad the Republicans don&#039;t have enough courage or willingness to stand on principle to support a return to a total ban on homosexuals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only wish it were true that Obama, and other American Presidents, ignored your &#8220;community.&#8221; That way, the US military would still have the sensible policy it did before &#8220;don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; was introduced &#8211; a complete ban on homosexuals, open or otherwise.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, it&#8217;s likely that Obama will eventually permit homosexuals to serve openly. Too bad the Republicans don&#8217;t have enough courage or willingness to stand on principle to support a return to a total ban on homosexuals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
