<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rekers&#8217; third &#8220;clarification&#8221; is even funnier than the others</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/05/05/22295/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/05/05/22295</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maurice Lacunza</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/05/05/22295/comment-page-1#comment-67956</link>
		<dc:creator>Maurice Lacunza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 18:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=22295#comment-67956</guid>
		<description>Enough talk. Stephen Colbert asks us:

W B W J R ?

Which Boy Would Jesus Rent?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enough talk. Stephen Colbert asks us:</p>
<p>W B W J R ?</p>
<p>Which Boy Would Jesus Rent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Doucette</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/05/05/22295/comment-page-1#comment-67946</link>
		<dc:creator>John Doucette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 16:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=22295#comment-67946</guid>
		<description>That sure is a lot of luggage for a 10-day trip. Nor does it look like his &quot;assistant&quot; is doing much assisting. Even is his going to Rentboy.com was innocuous, he certainly would have realized otherwise once he got to the site that these escorts were not hiring out as personal assistants. His right wing cronies might buy this crap but I doubt anybody else does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sure is a lot of luggage for a 10-day trip. Nor does it look like his &#8220;assistant&#8221; is doing much assisting. Even is his going to Rentboy.com was innocuous, he certainly would have realized otherwise once he got to the site that these escorts were not hiring out as personal assistants. His right wing cronies might buy this crap but I doubt anybody else does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred in the UK</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/05/05/22295/comment-page-1#comment-67927</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred in the UK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 10:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=22295#comment-67927</guid>
		<description>Slightly off topic...

$87,000 for expert testimony, is that the going rate in the U.S.? To me that sounds suspicious of being paid to say whatever the AG wanted him to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slightly off topic&#8230;</p>
<p>$87,000 for expert testimony, is that the going rate in the U.S.? To me that sounds suspicious of being paid to say whatever the AG wanted him to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dana daniell</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/05/05/22295/comment-page-1#comment-67924</link>
		<dc:creator>dana daniell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 07:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=22295#comment-67924</guid>
		<description>Dr. Reker is full of bull shit, if he is tring to deny being a closeted homosexual.  JUST COME OUT AND DENOUNCE AND CONDEMN THE FRC, do the right thing for a change!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Reker is full of bull shit, if he is tring to deny being a closeted homosexual.  JUST COME OUT AND DENOUNCE AND CONDEMN THE FRC, do the right thing for a change!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cowboy</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/05/05/22295/comment-page-1#comment-67913</link>
		<dc:creator>cowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 03:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=22295#comment-67913</guid>
		<description>Impressive Vitae.  And in one fell swoop his legacy will be reduced to one historical item in 2010.  

Pity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impressive Vitae.  And in one fell swoop his legacy will be reduced to one historical item in 2010.  </p>
<p>Pity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Rush</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/05/05/22295/comment-page-1#comment-67908</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Rush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 02:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=22295#comment-67908</guid>
		<description>For anyone who is interested: Yesterday I ran across Rekers&#039; &lt;em&gt;Curriculum Vitae &lt;/em&gt;(PDF) on professorgeorge.com. Today it is gone (all 13 pages of it). &lt;a href=&quot;http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&amp;q=cache:wLNhUXvf7wUJ:www.professorgeorge.com/Psychology_%257C_Professor_George_files/Prof%2520George%2520Rekers%2520050109.pdf+George+Rekers+%22Curriculum+Vitae%22&amp;hl=en&amp;gl=us&amp;pid=bl&amp;srcid=ADGEESjm_sjMACEOhKTUe06jCuTnsgCD36RMT3KZBB0kzVoJsREScmKjpMKefbeHLqNpb4iFaCsUS1aVk7k_rzs-E_HryfgdYc0_g02AMzIpSfF9oPVGQm4rhTnqpBM8dq95WeCkIu5Q&amp;sig=AHIEtbQnvYkmY7k2UrqF45dEibvmS1vG7g&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;BUT &lt;/strong&gt;there is still a copy available in the form of &lt;em&gt;Google docs&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. I suspect it may disappear soon just as Google caches do, but I believe that problem has been taken care of. (Note: when the file first loads the text is very blurry, but it will clear up)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For anyone who is interested: Yesterday I ran across Rekers&#8217; <em>Curriculum Vitae </em>(PDF) on professorgeorge.com. Today it is gone (all 13 pages of it). <a href="http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&amp;q=cache:wLNhUXvf7wUJ:www.professorgeorge.com/Psychology_%257C_Professor_George_files/Prof%2520George%2520Rekers%2520050109.pdf+George+Rekers+%22Curriculum+Vitae%22&amp;hl=en&amp;gl=us&amp;pid=bl&amp;srcid=ADGEESjm_sjMACEOhKTUe06jCuTnsgCD36RMT3KZBB0kzVoJsREScmKjpMKefbeHLqNpb4iFaCsUS1aVk7k_rzs-E_HryfgdYc0_g02AMzIpSfF9oPVGQm4rhTnqpBM8dq95WeCkIu5Q&amp;sig=AHIEtbQnvYkmY7k2UrqF45dEibvmS1vG7g" rel="nofollow"><strong>BUT </strong>there is still a copy available in the form of <em>Google docs</em></a>. I suspect it may disappear soon just as Google caches do, but I believe that problem has been taken care of. (Note: when the file first loads the text is very blurry, but it will clear up)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/05/05/22295/comment-page-1#comment-67907</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 01:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=22295#comment-67907</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;By the way, you left out the most crucial qualification: 8″ uncut. How could you have missed that? 

Next time I’m in a position to hire an assistant, I’m going to have to insist on seeing that on a resume.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I trust that you&#039;ll give his qualifications a thorough vetting in the interview process, Jim.  After all, one must have standards and lying about one&#039;s qualifications is usually seen as being ill-advised when seeking employment.  Mr. Rekker&#039;s no doubt sought value for his money so likewise performed his own verification of Geo&#039;s resume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>By the way, you left out the most crucial qualification: 8″ uncut. How could you have missed that? </p>
<p>Next time I’m in a position to hire an assistant, I’m going to have to insist on seeing that on a resume.</p></blockquote>
<p>I trust that you&#8217;ll give his qualifications a thorough vetting in the interview process, Jim.  After all, one must have standards and lying about one&#8217;s qualifications is usually seen as being ill-advised when seeking employment.  Mr. Rekker&#8217;s no doubt sought value for his money so likewise performed his own verification of Geo&#8217;s resume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrewB</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/05/05/22295/comment-page-1#comment-67906</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 01:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=22295#comment-67906</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t worry about a lawsuit anytime soon -- slander is for spoken word; libel is for print.  This guy sure is a rocket scientist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t worry about a lawsuit anytime soon &#8212; slander is for spoken word; libel is for print.  This guy sure is a rocket scientist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: true values voter</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/05/05/22295/comment-page-1#comment-67904</link>
		<dc:creator>true values voter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 01:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=22295#comment-67904</guid>
		<description>So many fascinating layers here:

1.  OK, Dr. Rekers, let&#039;s say your explanation of needing a heavy lifting assistant is fully true -- not a quarter-truth, not a half-truth, a full truth.  I trust it&#039;s true because you are a Christian and Christians are instructed not to bear false witness.  So, that said, where, exactly did you connect with or find the assistant?

2.  If Dr. Rekers can be in severe, pathological denial, &lt;b&gt;it &lt;i&gt;greatly&lt;/i&gt; raises suspicions about Peter LaBarbera, Matt Barber, Brian Brown, Janet Folger Porter, Tony Perkins, Brian Camenker, and others&lt;/b&gt;.  I&#039;m not actually in the school that says these people &quot;have to be&quot; closet cases -- I do think a small of straight people can become obsessed with homosexuality for idiosyncratic reasons (probably connected to childhood trauma).  However.  If Rekers has maintained a &quot;straight&quot; charade (denial to the point of convincing themselves) for decades, so can others.  Like LaBarbera.  Some of the arch-homophobes curiously kind of do &lt;i&gt;look&lt;/i&gt; gay (Brown)/lesbian (Porter).

3.  Then there&#039;s the web of relationships and contributions to gay-bashing endeavors that Rekers has received and made, including in Florida.  In Florida this includes, apparently, taxpayer money giving him $87,000 to develop a anti-gay-adoption report.

4.  The man is apparently wealthy.  Most people can&#039;t afford to hire a hooker for 10 days straights.  I would love to know exactly how much money changed hands.

5.  And where does he get his money?  The state of Florida?

6.  So who has quoted and used Rekers&#039; documents or research?  Probably some of the people regularly featured on this very website.

7.  The FRC referred to him as being c. 1983 a psychiatrist at the University of South Carolina medical school.  I wonder what the University of South Carolina medical school thinks?  For how long was there?  Anybody want to ask?

8.  What about all his patients...all his students?  His teen sex questions website counselees?  Any comments from any of them?

9.  He campaigned against gay adoption, while he himself apparently adopted a 16 year old boy.  I guess he was allowed because, of course, he&#039;s not gay.  (Is or was there a wife involved?)

10.  I bet there are other layers I am not thinking of, and other connections and side stories that are yet to emerge.

11.  To what extent is Tony Perkins, now, not telling the truth about his interactions with Rekers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So many fascinating layers here:</p>
<p>1.  OK, Dr. Rekers, let&#8217;s say your explanation of needing a heavy lifting assistant is fully true &#8212; not a quarter-truth, not a half-truth, a full truth.  I trust it&#8217;s true because you are a Christian and Christians are instructed not to bear false witness.  So, that said, where, exactly did you connect with or find the assistant?</p>
<p>2.  If Dr. Rekers can be in severe, pathological denial, <b>it <i>greatly</i> raises suspicions about Peter LaBarbera, Matt Barber, Brian Brown, Janet Folger Porter, Tony Perkins, Brian Camenker, and others</b>.  I&#8217;m not actually in the school that says these people &#8220;have to be&#8221; closet cases &#8212; I do think a small of straight people can become obsessed with homosexuality for idiosyncratic reasons (probably connected to childhood trauma).  However.  If Rekers has maintained a &#8220;straight&#8221; charade (denial to the point of convincing themselves) for decades, so can others.  Like LaBarbera.  Some of the arch-homophobes curiously kind of do <i>look</i> gay (Brown)/lesbian (Porter).</p>
<p>3.  Then there&#8217;s the web of relationships and contributions to gay-bashing endeavors that Rekers has received and made, including in Florida.  In Florida this includes, apparently, taxpayer money giving him $87,000 to develop a anti-gay-adoption report.</p>
<p>4.  The man is apparently wealthy.  Most people can&#8217;t afford to hire a hooker for 10 days straights.  I would love to know exactly how much money changed hands.</p>
<p>5.  And where does he get his money?  The state of Florida?</p>
<p>6.  So who has quoted and used Rekers&#8217; documents or research?  Probably some of the people regularly featured on this very website.</p>
<p>7.  The FRC referred to him as being c. 1983 a psychiatrist at the University of South Carolina medical school.  I wonder what the University of South Carolina medical school thinks?  For how long was there?  Anybody want to ask?</p>
<p>8.  What about all his patients&#8230;all his students?  His teen sex questions website counselees?  Any comments from any of them?</p>
<p>9.  He campaigned against gay adoption, while he himself apparently adopted a 16 year old boy.  I guess he was allowed because, of course, he&#8217;s not gay.  (Is or was there a wife involved?)</p>
<p>10.  I bet there are other layers I am not thinking of, and other connections and side stories that are yet to emerge.</p>
<p>11.  To what extent is Tony Perkins, now, not telling the truth about his interactions with Rekers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Rush</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/05/05/22295/comment-page-1#comment-67900</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Rush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 23:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=22295#comment-67900</guid>
		<description>Rekers, in his capacity as both a Super Christian and a proponent of NARTHian &quot;science,&quot; has for decades been accustomed to having  his BS enthusiastically accepted by his usual limited audience. Now, some of them may buy his preposterous rent-a-boy explanations, but everyone outside of the Bible-y/Science-y bubble will be rolling on the floor. 

It&#039;s appropriate that the combination of &lt;strong&gt;B&lt;/strong&gt;ible-y + &lt;strong&gt;S&lt;/strong&gt;cience-y = &lt;strong&gt;BS&lt;/strong&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rekers, in his capacity as both a Super Christian and a proponent of NARTHian &#8220;science,&#8221; has for decades been accustomed to having  his BS enthusiastically accepted by his usual limited audience. Now, some of them may buy his preposterous rent-a-boy explanations, but everyone outside of the Bible-y/Science-y bubble will be rolling on the floor. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s appropriate that the combination of <strong>B</strong>ible-y + <strong>S</strong>cience-y = <strong>BS</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
