<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House passes Defense Authorization Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/05/28/23116/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/05/28/23116</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 22:00:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burr</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/05/28/23116/comment-page-1#comment-70976</link>
		<dc:creator>Burr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 22:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=23116#comment-70976</guid>
		<description>Gates is still squawking about a veto..

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100620/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_military_gays_1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gates is still squawking about a veto..</p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100620/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_military_gays_1" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100620/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_military_gays_1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/05/28/23116/comment-page-1#comment-69362</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 14:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=23116#comment-69362</guid>
		<description>He is threatening to veto it because it contains a provision to fund a second engine for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.

Yeah, if he vetoes it, we will be flat out told we are a lower priority than a single jet engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is threatening to veto it because it contains a provision to fund a second engine for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.</p>
<p>Yeah, if he vetoes it, we will be flat out told we are a lower priority than a single jet engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in the Bay Area</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/05/28/23116/comment-page-1#comment-69352</link>
		<dc:creator>John in the Bay Area</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 06:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=23116#comment-69352</guid>
		<description>A presidential veto is a very strong statement, as well as a demonstration that the president is willing to fight for or against something.

This president has shown neither of those characteristics throughout his presidency and now would be a very strange time to start given this Defense Authorization Bill is coming from a Congress controlled in both houses by Democrats.

I suspect he&#039;ll sign whatever they send him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A presidential veto is a very strong statement, as well as a demonstration that the president is willing to fight for or against something.</p>
<p>This president has shown neither of those characteristics throughout his presidency and now would be a very strange time to start given this Defense Authorization Bill is coming from a Congress controlled in both houses by Democrats.</p>
<p>I suspect he&#8217;ll sign whatever they send him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob in San diego</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/05/28/23116/comment-page-1#comment-69351</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob in San diego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 06:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=23116#comment-69351</guid>
		<description>Why is the President going to veto it, is it because the republicans are poisoning it with wasteful spending that he doesn&#039;t want?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is the President going to veto it, is it because the republicans are poisoning it with wasteful spending that he doesn&#8217;t want?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
