Comments on: The right way to defend an unfair, undefendable, and unconstitutional law http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/06/17/23549 News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric Sat, 18 May 2013 21:32:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: Regan DuCasse http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/06/17/23549/comment-page-1#comment-70704 Regan DuCasse Fri, 18 Jun 2010 02:19:47 +0000 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=23549#comment-70704 That waive certainly incensed NOM, and others who want their elected leaders, to defend, not only what's indefensible, but what isn't present in the law. At least Schwartzeneggar was consistent in that he would agree with whatever the courts decided and wouldn't interfere. That waive certainly incensed NOM, and others who want their elected leaders, to defend, not only what’s indefensible, but what isn’t present in the law.
At least Schwartzeneggar was consistent in that he would agree with whatever the courts decided and wouldn’t interfere.

]]> By: Chris McCoy http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/06/17/23549/comment-page-1#comment-70693 Chris McCoy Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:42:01 +0000 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=23549#comment-70693 I wish someone would point this out to our Fierce Advocate in the White House when he goes to defend DOMA. I wish someone would point this out to our Fierce Advocate in the White House when he goes to defend DOMA.

]]>