<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wisconsin ban on all couple recognition upheld by state supreme court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/06/30/23872/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/06/30/23872</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 02:47:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EZam</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/06/30/23872/comment-page-1#comment-71621</link>
		<dc:creator>EZam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 06:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=23872#comment-71621</guid>
		<description>Is there a way to challenge that like what Olson/Boies are doing in CA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a way to challenge that like what Olson/Boies are doing in CA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindoro Almaviva</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/06/30/23872/comment-page-1#comment-71586</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindoro Almaviva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=23872#comment-71586</guid>
		<description>I am with Stefano. I think it would have been better if a constitutional challenge to the actual spirit was mounted. As of right now, couples in WI are still screwed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am with Stefano. I think it would have been better if a constitutional challenge to the actual spirit was mounted. As of right now, couples in WI are still screwed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefano A</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/06/30/23872/comment-page-1#comment-71583</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefano A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=23872#comment-71583</guid>
		<description>I suppose there is some small consolation to be taken in that the court rejected the challenge to domestic partnerships and this ruling was on the legal process rather than the merits of the ban.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose there is some small consolation to be taken in that the court rejected the challenge to domestic partnerships and this ruling was on the legal process rather than the merits of the ban.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
