<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Limbaugh confirms support for civil unions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/07/29/24830/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/07/29/24830</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 22:00:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cd</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/07/29/24830/comment-page-1#comment-74249</link>
		<dc:creator>cd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 18:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=24830#comment-74249</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Either he’s more liberal on social issues than he lets on, or he’s realized conservatives have lost on the issue and so he’s compromising without making it look that way.&lt;/i&gt;

Or, he doesn&#039;t actually have strong beliefs- he just recognizes which side has the advantages (with some initial bias) and those appeal to him far more than any of the substance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Either he’s more liberal on social issues than he lets on, or he’s realized conservatives have lost on the issue and so he’s compromising without making it look that way.</i></p>
<p>Or, he doesn&#8217;t actually have strong beliefs- he just recognizes which side has the advantages (with some initial bias) and those appeal to him far more than any of the substance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.J.</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/07/29/24830/comment-page-1#comment-74074</link>
		<dc:creator>T.J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=24830#comment-74074</guid>
		<description>I see this as a good thing...there&#039;s a reason they call them dittoheads, my friends, and that&#039;s because they parrot anything this guy says. Either he&#039;s more liberal on social issues than he lets on, or he&#039;s realized conservatives have lost on the issue and so he&#039;s compromising without making it look that way.  My dad is always listening to Rush and so I have to sit through it at times.  The guy is not stupid by any stretch of the imagination.  He&#039;s actually quite brilliant and a master of right-wing spin and so if he&#039;s saying it, his followers will likely follow suit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see this as a good thing&#8230;there&#8217;s a reason they call them dittoheads, my friends, and that&#8217;s because they parrot anything this guy says. Either he&#8217;s more liberal on social issues than he lets on, or he&#8217;s realized conservatives have lost on the issue and so he&#8217;s compromising without making it look that way.  My dad is always listening to Rush and so I have to sit through it at times.  The guy is not stupid by any stretch of the imagination.  He&#8217;s actually quite brilliant and a master of right-wing spin and so if he&#8217;s saying it, his followers will likely follow suit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/07/29/24830/comment-page-1#comment-74051</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=24830#comment-74051</guid>
		<description>My understanding of Elton&#039;s position is that he is not &quot;against&quot; gay marriage, he simply thinks Civil Unions are an acceptable compromise. But when you choose to lie down with dogs, you&#039;re getting covered with fleas. Elton&#039;s legacy will forever be tarnished by his choice to associate with Rush. Hope the money was worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My understanding of Elton&#8217;s position is that he is not &#8220;against&#8221; gay marriage, he simply thinks Civil Unions are an acceptable compromise. But when you choose to lie down with dogs, you&#8217;re getting covered with fleas. Elton&#8217;s legacy will forever be tarnished by his choice to associate with Rush. Hope the money was worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/07/29/24830/comment-page-1#comment-74050</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=24830#comment-74050</guid>
		<description>This is a very cynical ploy on Limbaugh&#039;s part. He knows that his Right-Wing have lost the issue, so he is positioning himself to amplify the remaining vestige of anti-gay positioning. Many people have forgotten that around 1989-91 he did a stage show called &#039;The Rush to Excellence Tour&#039;. During those performances (I attended the one at Arco Arena), he riled up the crowd into some of the most vicious homophobic hate I have ever seen - playing various skits about Barney Frank (&#039;My Boy Lolipop&#039;) and mocking people with AIDS (&#039;You&#039;ll Never Love This Way Again&#039;). The crowd would whoop an holler with a murderous zeal at the &#039;faggots&#039; that Limbaugh so despises. During that period, he also had an ongoing war with GLAAD, constantly saying &quot;Flag the tape, flag the tape&quot; and then making digs at them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very cynical ploy on Limbaugh&#8217;s part. He knows that his Right-Wing have lost the issue, so he is positioning himself to amplify the remaining vestige of anti-gay positioning. Many people have forgotten that around 1989-91 he did a stage show called &#8216;The Rush to Excellence Tour&#8217;. During those performances (I attended the one at Arco Arena), he riled up the crowd into some of the most vicious homophobic hate I have ever seen &#8211; playing various skits about Barney Frank (&#8216;My Boy Lolipop&#8217;) and mocking people with AIDS (&#8216;You&#8217;ll Never Love This Way Again&#8217;). The crowd would whoop an holler with a murderous zeal at the &#8216;faggots&#8217; that Limbaugh so despises. During that period, he also had an ongoing war with GLAAD, constantly saying &#8220;Flag the tape, flag the tape&#8221; and then making digs at them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TampaZeke</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/07/29/24830/comment-page-1#comment-74044</link>
		<dc:creator>TampaZeke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=24830#comment-74044</guid>
		<description>This is why Elton John&#039;s position is so infuriating.  He gives gas bags like Limbaugh carte blanche to claim that it&#039;s OK for him to be against civil equality for gays because a gay person is also against it.

If I remember correctly Elton John used to claim he was straight, and then bisexual.  Limbaugh better hold off on pointing to John.  His position on just about anything seems to be a moving target.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why Elton John&#8217;s position is so infuriating.  He gives gas bags like Limbaugh carte blanche to claim that it&#8217;s OK for him to be against civil equality for gays because a gay person is also against it.</p>
<p>If I remember correctly Elton John used to claim he was straight, and then bisexual.  Limbaugh better hold off on pointing to John.  His position on just about anything seems to be a moving target.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben in Oakland</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/07/29/24830/comment-page-1#comment-74043</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben in Oakland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=24830#comment-74043</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m perfecty happy for rush&#039;s support, and I want to thank him for it. One more of the props underneath anti-gay animus going down rapidly. I&#039;ll take what I can get.

At the same time, Faux News and rush limbaugh--feh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m perfecty happy for rush&#8217;s support, and I want to thank him for it. One more of the props underneath anti-gay animus going down rapidly. I&#8217;ll take what I can get.</p>
<p>At the same time, Faux News and rush limbaugh&#8211;feh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily K</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/07/29/24830/comment-page-1#comment-74030</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=24830#comment-74030</guid>
		<description>To paraphrase a South Park quote,

ELTON JOHN IS NOT THE EMPEROR OF GAY PEOPLE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To paraphrase a South Park quote,</p>
<p>ELTON JOHN IS NOT THE EMPEROR OF GAY PEOPLE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott P.</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/07/29/24830/comment-page-1#comment-74025</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=24830#comment-74025</guid>
		<description>Elton John isn&#039;t married, but then, the U.K. doesn&#039;t provide for same-sex marriage, so Rushbo&#039;s point is moot. If full marriage equality was available to John, and he preferred to remain in a civil union, THEN, and only then would The Fat One&#039;s argument be valid.

Personally, I&#039;ve never cared for John&#039;s music, so his opinion on ANYTHING is meaningless to me. He&#039;s the biggest media-whore I&#039;ve ever seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elton John isn&#8217;t married, but then, the U.K. doesn&#8217;t provide for same-sex marriage, so Rushbo&#8217;s point is moot. If full marriage equality was available to John, and he preferred to remain in a civil union, THEN, and only then would The Fat One&#8217;s argument be valid.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;ve never cared for John&#8217;s music, so his opinion on ANYTHING is meaningless to me. He&#8217;s the biggest media-whore I&#8217;ve ever seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindoro Almaviva</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/07/29/24830/comment-page-1#comment-74024</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindoro Almaviva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=24830#comment-74024</guid>
		<description>And that is precisely the reason why neither his voice, nor Elton&#039;s are heard in my house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And that is precisely the reason why neither his voice, nor Elton&#8217;s are heard in my house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/07/29/24830/comment-page-1#comment-74019</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=24830#comment-74019</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t a new position.  Limbaugh has been stating this for years.  I&#039;m surprised this is a new revelation.  

Of course he, Elton John, and Obama are still in the wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t a new position.  Limbaugh has been stating this for years.  I&#8217;m surprised this is a new revelation.  </p>
<p>Of course he, Elton John, and Obama are still in the wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
