<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the Cornyn meeting matters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/07/30/24856/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/07/30/24856</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:47:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priya Lynn</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/07/30/24856/comment-page-1#comment-74194</link>
		<dc:creator>Priya Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=24856#comment-74194</guid>
		<description>In thinking about it, Other Fred, the profit means the government owned insurance agency helps pay for government services people would otherwise pay taxes for so its a double win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In thinking about it, Other Fred, the profit means the government owned insurance agency helps pay for government services people would otherwise pay taxes for so its a double win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priya Lynn</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/07/30/24856/comment-page-1#comment-74193</link>
		<dc:creator>Priya Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=24856#comment-74193</guid>
		<description>Other Fred, nothing. Saskatchewan Government Insurance consistently makes a profit so people pay what it costs to license their cars and no more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other Fred, nothing. Saskatchewan Government Insurance consistently makes a profit so people pay what it costs to license their cars and no more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Other Fred in the UK</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/07/30/24856/comment-page-1#comment-74190</link>
		<dc:creator>Other Fred in the UK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 18:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=24856#comment-74190</guid>
		<description>Personally, I reserve judgement until I read what Coryn had to say (and didn&#039;t have to say).

Just out of curiosity, Priya Lynn, how much does the tax payer end up paying towards auto-insurance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I reserve judgement until I read what Coryn had to say (and didn&#8217;t have to say).</p>
<p>Just out of curiosity, Priya Lynn, how much does the tax payer end up paying towards auto-insurance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priya Lynn</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/07/30/24856/comment-page-1#comment-74181</link>
		<dc:creator>Priya Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=24856#comment-74181</guid>
		<description>Andrew said &quot;You want choice &amp; change? Get rid of monopolies. Works the same for politics as it does for commerce.&quot;.

In Saskatchewan the government has a monopoly on auto insurance and our auto insurance is the cheapest in the country, 1/4 the cost of a number of other provinces with private insurance companies &quot;competing&quot; with each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew said &#8220;You want choice &amp; change? Get rid of monopolies. Works the same for politics as it does for commerce.&#8221;.</p>
<p>In Saskatchewan the government has a monopoly on auto insurance and our auto insurance is the cheapest in the country, 1/4 the cost of a number of other provinces with private insurance companies &#8220;competing&#8221; with each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TampaZeke</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/07/30/24856/comment-page-1#comment-74170</link>
		<dc:creator>TampaZeke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 14:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=24856#comment-74170</guid>
		<description>See the story below to see what it is that Jim said with which I agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See the story below to see what it is that Jim said with which I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TampaZeke</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/07/30/24856/comment-page-1#comment-74169</link>
		<dc:creator>TampaZeke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 14:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=24856#comment-74169</guid>
		<description>Andrew, it was Jim, not Tim, that I agree with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, it was Jim, not Tim, that I agree with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/07/30/24856/comment-page-1#comment-74151</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 03:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=24856#comment-74151</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not afraid to agree with Jim on this one at all.  After decades of doing very little for gays in Massachusetts, it was Bill Weld, a Republican, who first made dramatic pro-gay legislation a priority (NOT an afterthought) in his administration -- including the first GSA groups in schools.  Frankly, the best hope for gay rights in this country truly resides with old-school &quot;northeast&quot; style (read: fiscally conservative, socially libertarian) Republicans.  

As we&#039;ve seen with the current administration, the Dems are too concerned about appearances to really commit to the changes they promise to our community.  Our Republican allies remind the Democrats that the gay demographic isn&#039;t captive -- we have choices.  And in many districts, neutralizing the &quot;gay bloc&quot; (the only demographic beaten by retirees with respect to % turnout) can tip the balance of victory -- and many in the GOP are waking up to this in swing states -- more importantly, as Dems figure this out, they&#039;ll finally realize they actually have to fight for our vote.  

You want choice &amp; change?  Get rid of monopolies.  Works the same for politics as it does for commerce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not afraid to agree with Jim on this one at all.  After decades of doing very little for gays in Massachusetts, it was Bill Weld, a Republican, who first made dramatic pro-gay legislation a priority (NOT an afterthought) in his administration &#8212; including the first GSA groups in schools.  Frankly, the best hope for gay rights in this country truly resides with old-school &#8220;northeast&#8221; style (read: fiscally conservative, socially libertarian) Republicans.  </p>
<p>As we&#8217;ve seen with the current administration, the Dems are too concerned about appearances to really commit to the changes they promise to our community.  Our Republican allies remind the Democrats that the gay demographic isn&#8217;t captive &#8212; we have choices.  And in many districts, neutralizing the &#8220;gay bloc&#8221; (the only demographic beaten by retirees with respect to % turnout) can tip the balance of victory &#8212; and many in the GOP are waking up to this in swing states &#8212; more importantly, as Dems figure this out, they&#8217;ll finally realize they actually have to fight for our vote.  </p>
<p>You want choice &amp; change?  Get rid of monopolies.  Works the same for politics as it does for commerce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/07/30/24856/comment-page-1#comment-74137</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 01:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=24856#comment-74137</guid>
		<description>Hey Timothy...

I had thought that the Republican Unity Coalition was still a small but ongoing effort; your omission of it prompted me to google &lt;em&gt;gerald ford gay republicans&lt;/em&gt; and find that I&#039;m &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Unity_Coalition&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;four years&lt;/a&gt; behind the times.

Not directly related to this post, I&#039;ve been skeptical/cynical about LCR for a good while. Reading the transcripts of the DADT trial, I found myself addicted, as much as I was to the Olson/Boies Prop 8 trial. I&#039;ve emerged from both with a sense that I need to be better at hearing and understanding the LCR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Timothy&#8230;</p>
<p>I had thought that the Republican Unity Coalition was still a small but ongoing effort; your omission of it prompted me to google <em>gerald ford gay republicans</em> and find that I&#8217;m <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Unity_Coalition" rel="nofollow">four years</a> behind the times.</p>
<p>Not directly related to this post, I&#8217;ve been skeptical/cynical about LCR for a good while. Reading the transcripts of the DADT trial, I found myself addicted, as much as I was to the Olson/Boies Prop 8 trial. I&#8217;ve emerged from both with a sense that I need to be better at hearing and understanding the LCR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candace</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/07/30/24856/comment-page-1#comment-74127</link>
		<dc:creator>Candace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 23:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=24856#comment-74127</guid>
		<description>The message it sends is this:  the SMART rats are already deserting a sinking ship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The message it sends is this:  the SMART rats are already deserting a sinking ship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TampaZeke</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/07/30/24856/comment-page-1#comment-74106</link>
		<dc:creator>TampaZeke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=24856#comment-74106</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m afraid I&#039;m with Jim on this one.  I see nothing positive about this.  It&#039;s the strangest and most inexplicable pandering I&#039;ve seen yet.

Tim, you often seem desperate to find gay positive signs and portents where there are none.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid I&#8217;m with Jim on this one.  I see nothing positive about this.  It&#8217;s the strangest and most inexplicable pandering I&#8217;ve seen yet.</p>
<p>Tim, you often seem desperate to find gay positive signs and portents where there are none.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
