<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to conduct a fraudulent &#8220;poll&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/08/13/25406/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/08/13/25406</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 05:23:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/08/13/25406/comment-page-1#comment-75829</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 00:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=25406#comment-75829</guid>
		<description>Tiff,

Thanks for the link.  That is my understanding as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tiff,</p>
<p>Thanks for the link.  That is my understanding as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonardo Ricardo</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/08/13/25406/comment-page-1#comment-75827</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonardo Ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 23:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=25406#comment-75827</guid>
		<description>OFF TOPIC: URGENT CALL and ALERT FOR UGANDA:  

Where is ¨gug¨ at Gay Uganda blog?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://leonardoricardosanto.blogspot.com/2010/08/where-is-gug-at-gay-uganda-because-it.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; HERE &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OFF TOPIC: URGENT CALL and ALERT FOR UGANDA:  </p>
<p>Where is ¨gug¨ at Gay Uganda blog?</p>
<p><a href="http://leonardoricardosanto.blogspot.com/2010/08/where-is-gug-at-gay-uganda-because-it.html" rel="nofollow"> HERE </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah S.</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/08/13/25406/comment-page-1#comment-75825</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 23:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=25406#comment-75825</guid>
		<description>Ryan: the wording of the poll makes those who are indecisive seem as though they are leaning toward the side of those who are against Judge Walker&#039;s case, and the no side has a much longer and more thorough explanation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan: the wording of the poll makes those who are indecisive seem as though they are leaning toward the side of those who are against Judge Walker&#8217;s case, and the no side has a much longer and more thorough explanation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason D</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/08/13/25406/comment-page-1#comment-75824</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=25406#comment-75824</guid>
		<description>just saying:

&lt;b&gt;PROBLEMATIC:&lt;/b&gt; &quot;transgendered&quot;
&lt;b&gt;PREFERRED:&lt;/b&gt; &quot;transgender&quot;
The word transgender never needs the extraneous &quot;ed&quot; at the end of the word. In fact, such a construction is grammatically incorrect. Only verbs can be transformed into participles by adding &quot;-ed&quot; to the end of the word, and transgender is an adjective, not a verb.

http://www.glaad.org/page.aspx?pid=376</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just saying:</p>
<p><b>PROBLEMATIC:</b> &#8220;transgendered&#8221;<br />
<b>PREFERRED:</b> &#8220;transgender&#8221;<br />
The word transgender never needs the extraneous &#8220;ed&#8221; at the end of the word. In fact, such a construction is grammatically incorrect. Only verbs can be transformed into participles by adding &#8220;-ed&#8221; to the end of the word, and transgender is an adjective, not a verb.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.glaad.org/page.aspx?pid=376" rel="nofollow">http://www.glaad.org/page.aspx?pid=376</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burr</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/08/13/25406/comment-page-1#comment-75823</link>
		<dc:creator>Burr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=25406#comment-75823</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s somewhat interesting that we haven&#039;t seen the same level of pressure for trans inclusion on DADT repeal that we saw for ENDA.. Is it because they &lt;i&gt;do&lt;/i&gt; think it helps them at least a little?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s somewhat interesting that we haven&#8217;t seen the same level of pressure for trans inclusion on DADT repeal that we saw for ENDA.. Is it because they <i>do</i> think it helps them at least a little?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiff</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/08/13/25406/comment-page-1#comment-75822</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=25406#comment-75822</guid>
		<description>To be clear, transgender people are currently discharged from military service under DADT.  If DADT is repealed, trans people would still be discharged from military service, but for different reasons.  http://www.pamshouseblend.com/diary/16707/ncte-warns-transgender-servicemembers-regarding-dadt-and-coming-out-trans</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be clear, transgender people are currently discharged from military service under DADT.  If DADT is repealed, trans people would still be discharged from military service, but for different reasons.  <a href="http://www.pamshouseblend.com/diary/16707/ncte-warns-transgender-servicemembers-regarding-dadt-and-coming-out-trans" rel="nofollow">http://www.pamshouseblend.com/diary/16707/ncte-warns-transgender-servicemembers-regarding-dadt-and-coming-out-trans</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiff</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/08/13/25406/comment-page-1#comment-75821</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=25406#comment-75821</guid>
		<description>To be clear, transgender are currently discharged from military service under DADT.  If DADT is repealed, trans people would still be discharged from military service, but for different reasons.  http://www.pamshouseblend.com/diary/16707/ncte-warns-transgender-servicemembers-regarding-dadt-and-coming-out-trans</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be clear, transgender are currently discharged from military service under DADT.  If DADT is repealed, trans people would still be discharged from military service, but for different reasons.  <a href="http://www.pamshouseblend.com/diary/16707/ncte-warns-transgender-servicemembers-regarding-dadt-and-coming-out-trans" rel="nofollow">http://www.pamshouseblend.com/diary/16707/ncte-warns-transgender-servicemembers-regarding-dadt-and-coming-out-trans</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/08/13/25406/comment-page-1#comment-75820</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 21:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=25406#comment-75820</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much. You cleared a lot of stuff up for me; it makes sense to me why DADT affects transgendered soldiers. I guess my only quibble with what you said is when you said the fact that your transgendered male friend is still biologically female is irrelevant. I agree that in his day-to-day private life its his prerogative to present himself how he wishes; I don&#039;t think its fair to expect the military to abide by that, though. Your friend is legally and biologically still a women. It would be pretty strange and even dangerous for the miltary to have him wear male uniforms and bunk with straight male soldiers. Your friend made a decision to give up some access of his personal life while serving, especially while on duty. And if other military personnel saw him with his girlfriend, I don&#039;t think it would be stupid or ignorant of them to assume he is a lesbian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much. You cleared a lot of stuff up for me; it makes sense to me why DADT affects transgendered soldiers. I guess my only quibble with what you said is when you said the fact that your transgendered male friend is still biologically female is irrelevant. I agree that in his day-to-day private life its his prerogative to present himself how he wishes; I don&#8217;t think its fair to expect the military to abide by that, though. Your friend is legally and biologically still a women. It would be pretty strange and even dangerous for the miltary to have him wear male uniforms and bunk with straight male soldiers. Your friend made a decision to give up some access of his personal life while serving, especially while on duty. And if other military personnel saw him with his girlfriend, I don&#8217;t think it would be stupid or ignorant of them to assume he is a lesbian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/08/13/25406/comment-page-1#comment-75818</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 21:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=25406#comment-75818</guid>
		<description>Repealing DADT will have no direct effect on military service by transgender people.  While it is a worthy goal to instill protections for transgender persons in the Military, it is not a part of the current effort to repeal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Repealing DADT will have no direct effect on military service by transgender people.  While it is a worthy goal to instill protections for transgender persons in the Military, it is not a part of the current effort to repeal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy (TRiG)</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/08/13/25406/comment-page-1#comment-75810</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy (TRiG)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 17:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=25406#comment-75810</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2yhN1IDLQjo&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Opinion Polls: Getting the results you want&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

TRiG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2yhN1IDLQjo" rel="nofollow">Opinion Polls: Getting the results you want</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>TRiG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
