<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Trib spins their own poll in an odd way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/08/16/25465/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/08/16/25465</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:14:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willie Hewes</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/08/16/25465/comment-page-1#comment-75985</link>
		<dc:creator>Willie Hewes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=25465#comment-75985</guid>
		<description>Maybe he&#039;s doing something else. The people interviewed oppose gay and lesbian relationships on morality reasons, but the guy he opened with is reasonable: &quot;I think it&#039;s wrong but it&#039;s not my business.&quot; 

Getting people to the &quot;I think it&#039;s wrong but it&#039;s not my business&quot; point is easier than getting them to the &quot;It&#039;s not wrong&quot; point, so maybe the writing is trying to invite those opposed to that position without scaring them off by being all pro-gay at them.

But then it&#039;s hard to see why the last point is the &quot;bad for the children&quot; objection. The last point in an article is best remembered by readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe he&#8217;s doing something else. The people interviewed oppose gay and lesbian relationships on morality reasons, but the guy he opened with is reasonable: &#8220;I think it&#8217;s wrong but it&#8217;s not my business.&#8221; </p>
<p>Getting people to the &#8220;I think it&#8217;s wrong but it&#8217;s not my business&#8221; point is easier than getting them to the &#8220;It&#8217;s not wrong&#8221; point, so maybe the writing is trying to invite those opposed to that position without scaring them off by being all pro-gay at them.</p>
<p>But then it&#8217;s hard to see why the last point is the &#8220;bad for the children&#8221; objection. The last point in an article is best remembered by readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/08/16/25465/comment-page-1#comment-75966</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=25465#comment-75966</guid>
		<description>cgd,

Thank you.  At 47% to 35%, the City&#039;s pretty supportive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cgd,</p>
<p>Thank you.  At 47% to 35%, the City&#8217;s pretty supportive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/08/16/25465/comment-page-1#comment-75965</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=25465#comment-75965</guid>
		<description>Kim,

If population A opposes same sex marriage and population A+B is evenly split, then population B must support marriage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kim,</p>
<p>If population A opposes same sex marriage and population A+B is evenly split, then population B must support marriage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cgd</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/08/16/25465/comment-page-1#comment-75964</link>
		<dc:creator>cgd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=25465#comment-75964</guid>
		<description>The Chicago numbers are buried in this video:
http://www.wgntv.com/news/wgntv-gay-marriage-poll-aug15,0,2611162.story

summarizing:


marriage equality support 
(support% vs oppose%)

chicago+suburbs
42% vs 42%

chicago
47% vs 35%

suburbs
40% vs 46%

statewide (2005)
39% vs 48%


civil unions support

chicago+suburbs
54% vs 32%

chicago
53% vs 29%

suburbs
54% vs 33%

statewide (2005)
53% vs 36%


2005 statewide source:
http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/illinois_rejects_same_sex_marriage_backs_civil_unions/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Chicago numbers are buried in this video:<br />
<a href="http://www.wgntv.com/news/wgntv-gay-marriage-poll-aug15,0,2611162.story" rel="nofollow">http://www.wgntv.com/news/wgntv-gay-marriage-poll-aug15,0,2611162.story</a></p>
<p>summarizing:</p>
<p>marriage equality support<br />
(support% vs oppose%)</p>
<p>chicago+suburbs<br />
42% vs 42%</p>
<p>chicago<br />
47% vs 35%</p>
<p>suburbs<br />
40% vs 46%</p>
<p>statewide (2005)<br />
39% vs 48%</p>
<p>civil unions support</p>
<p>chicago+suburbs<br />
54% vs 32%</p>
<p>chicago<br />
53% vs 29%</p>
<p>suburbs<br />
54% vs 33%</p>
<p>statewide (2005)<br />
53% vs 36%</p>
<p>2005 statewide source:<br />
<a href="http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/illinois_rejects_same_sex_marriage_backs_civil_unions/" rel="nofollow">http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/illinois_rejects_same_sex_marriage_backs_civil_unions/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/08/16/25465/comment-page-1#comment-75963</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=25465#comment-75963</guid>
		<description>No, 42%+42%+15%=99% What you have here is that all tree values have been rounded downward. Not a problem, just what it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, 42%+42%+15%=99% What you have here is that all tree values have been rounded downward. Not a problem, just what it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
